NEAGX vs. UMBHX
NEAGX (Needham Aggressive Growth Fund) and UMBHX (Carillon Scout Small Cap Fund) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. At a correlation of -1.00, they often move in opposite directions. NEAGX charges 1.86%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for UMBHX.
Performance
NEAGX vs. UMBHX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
NEAGX
- 1D
- 1.06%
- 1M
- 12.81%
- YTD
- 54.53%
- 6M
- 59.73%
- 1Y
- 93.95%
- 3Y*
- 37.18%
- 5Y*
- 22.53%
- 10Y*
- 22.12%
UMBHX
- 1D
- -1.21%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NEAGX vs. UMBHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
NEAGX Needham Aggressive Growth Fund | -0.07% |
UMBHX Carillon Scout Small Cap Fund | -1.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between NEAGX and UMBHX is -1.00, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026 | -1.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NEAGX vs. UMBHX — Risk / Return Rank
NEAGX
UMBHX
NEAGX vs. UMBHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Needham Aggressive Growth Fund (NEAGX) and Carillon Scout Small Cap Fund (UMBHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NEAGX | UMBHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.67 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.19 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.56 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.60 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 26.66 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NEAGX | UMBHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.67 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.92 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | -20.59 | +21.24 |
Drawdowns
NEAGX vs. UMBHX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NEAGX drawdown since its inception was -41.80%, which is greater than UMBHX's maximum drawdown of -1.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEAGX and UMBHX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NEAGX | UMBHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.80% | -1.86% | -39.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.01% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.49% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.31% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.31% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.07% | -1.86% | +1.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.67% | -1.26% | -7.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.47% | — | — |
Volatility
NEAGX vs. UMBHX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NEAGX | UMBHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.81% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.26% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.69% | 6.22% | +19.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.53% | 6.22% | +18.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.13% | 6.22% | +17.91% |
NEAGX vs. UMBHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NEAGX has a 1.86% expense ratio, which is higher than UMBHX's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
NEAGX vs. UMBHX - Dividend Comparison
NEAGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%, while UMBHX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NEAGX Needham Aggressive Growth Fund | 1.38% | 2.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 7.10% | 3.91% | 10.64% | 16.57% | 5.17% | 6.72% | 11.88% |
UMBHX Carillon Scout Small Cap Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NEAGX and UMBHX have a correlation of -1.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for NEAGX and UMBHX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer