PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NEAGX vs. DSCIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NEAGX vs. DSCIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Needham Aggressive Growth Fund (NEAGX) and Dana Epiphany ESG Small Cap Equity Fund (DSCIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NEAGX achieves a 64.16% return, which is significantly higher than DSCIX's 27.35% return. Over the past 10 years, NEAGX has outperformed DSCIX with an annualized return of 22.99%, while DSCIX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.70% annualized return.


NEAGX

1D
1.28%
1M
11.45%
YTD
64.16%
6M
61.68%
1Y
94.43%
3Y*
39.56%
5Y*
23.57%
10Y*
22.99%

DSCIX

1D
0.59%
1M
7.00%
YTD
27.35%
6M
24.76%
1Y
49.12%
3Y*
18.43%
5Y*
9.13%
10Y*
10.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NEAGX vs. DSCIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NEAGX
Needham Aggressive Growth Fund
64.16%26.40%14.31%37.65%-27.53%37.56%51.53%43.82%-16.09%8.75%
DSCIX
Dana Epiphany ESG Small Cap Equity Fund
27.35%13.18%5.10%20.00%-21.46%30.92%13.33%21.51%-16.96%11.59%

Correlation

The correlation between NEAGX and DSCIX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

0.82

The correlation between NEAGX and DSCIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NEAGX vs. DSCIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NEAGX
NEAGX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
NEAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NEAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
NEAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
NEAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
NEAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

DSCIX
DSCIX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
DSCIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DSCIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
DSCIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
DSCIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
DSCIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NEAGX vs. DSCIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Needham Aggressive Growth Fund (NEAGX) and Dana Epiphany ESG Small Cap Equity Fund (DSCIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NEAGXDSCIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.54

1.49

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.83

7.23

-0.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

26.82

26.04

+0.77

NEAGX vs. DSCIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NEAGX Sharpe Ratio is 3.50, which is comparable to the DSCIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NEAGX and DSCIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NEAGX vs. DSCIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NEAGX drawdown since its inception was -41.80%, smaller than the maximum DSCIX drawdown of -47.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEAGX and DSCIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NEAGXDSCIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.80%

-47.60%

+5.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.01%

-7.08%

-6.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.49%

-32.94%

+4.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.31%

-32.94%

-3.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.31%

-47.60%

+11.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.66%

-9.82%

+1.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.56%

1.96%

+1.60%

Volatility

NEAGX vs. DSCIX - Volatility Comparison

Needham Aggressive Growth Fund (NEAGX) has a higher volatility of 11.64% compared to Dana Epiphany ESG Small Cap Equity Fund (DSCIX) at 4.51%. This indicates that NEAGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DSCIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NEAGXDSCIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.64%

4.51%

+7.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.15%

12.30%

+9.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.36%

17.39%

+9.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.92%

22.20%

+2.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.34%

23.26%

+1.08%

NEAGX vs. DSCIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NEAGX has a 1.86% expense ratio, which is higher than DSCIX's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

NEAGX vs. DSCIX - Dividend Comparison

NEAGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.30%, less than DSCIX's 4.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DSCIX
Dana Epiphany ESG Small Cap Equity Fund
4.68%6.01%0.16%0.30%4.99%8.71%0.05%0.00%9.11%0.03%0.18%0.00%
NEAGX
Needham Aggressive Growth Fund
1.30%2.14%0.00%0.00%0.00%7.10%3.91%10.64%16.57%5.17%6.72%11.88%

Frequently Asked Questions


NEAGX and DSCIX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NEAGX has higher volatility (11.64%) compared to DSCIX (4.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NEAGX dropped -41.80% vs DSCIX's -47.60%.

NEAGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.50 vs 2.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NEAGX and DSCIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer