NEAGX vs. DMCRX
NEAGX (Needham Aggressive Growth Fund) and DMCRX (Driehaus Micro Cap Growth Fund) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, NEAGX returned 21.19%/yr vs 22.13%/yr for DMCRX. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. NEAGX charges 1.86%/yr vs 1.38%/yr for DMCRX.
Performance
NEAGX vs. DMCRX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NEAGX achieves a 49.38% return, which is significantly higher than DMCRX's 31.07% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with NEAGX having a 21.19% annualized return and DMCRX not far ahead at 22.13%.
NEAGX
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- -5.50%
- 6M
- 38.51%
- YTD
- 49.38%
- 1Y
- 69.74%
- 3Y*
- 32.30%
- 5Y*
- 20.17%
- 10Y*
- 21.19%
DMCRX
- 1D
- -1.50%
- 1M
- 6.38%
- 6M
- 22.94%
- YTD
- 31.07%
- 1Y
- 79.24%
- 3Y*
- 30.91%
- 5Y*
- 11.43%
- 10Y*
- 22.13%
NEAGX vs. DMCRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NEAGX Needham Aggressive Growth Fund | 49.38% | 26.40% | 14.31% | 37.65% | -27.53% | 37.56% | 51.53% | 43.82% | -16.09% | 8.75% |
DMCRX Driehaus Micro Cap Growth Fund | 31.07% | 31.17% | 30.58% | 11.47% | -33.54% | 22.23% | 86.43% | 34.03% | 2.52% | 24.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between NEAGX and DMCRX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2013 | 0.82 |
The correlation between NEAGX and DMCRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NEAGX vs. DMCRX — Risk / Return Rank
NEAGX
DMCRX
NEAGX vs. DMCRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Needham Aggressive Growth Fund (NEAGX) and Driehaus Micro Cap Growth Fund (DMCRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NEAGX | DMCRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.39 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.92 | 4.98 | -0.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.45 | 17.17 | +0.28 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NEAGX vs. DMCRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NEAGX drawdown since its inception was -41.80%, smaller than the maximum DMCRX drawdown of -46.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEAGX and DMCRX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NEAGX | DMCRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.80% | -46.68% | +4.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.01% | -15.46% | +1.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.49% | -34.92% | +6.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.31% | -46.68% | +10.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.31% | -46.68% | +10.37% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.96% | -2.19% | -7.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.65% | -14.74% | +6.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.94% | 4.47% | -0.53% |
Volatility
NEAGX vs. DMCRX - Volatility Comparison
Needham Aggressive Growth Fund (NEAGX) has a higher volatility of 13.68% compared to Driehaus Micro Cap Growth Fund (DMCRX) at 8.72%. This indicates that NEAGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DMCRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NEAGX | DMCRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.68% | 8.72% | +4.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.59% | 22.72% | +1.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.25% | 29.82% | -0.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.36% | 28.72% | -3.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.50% | 28.01% | -3.51% |
NEAGX vs. DMCRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NEAGX has a 1.86% expense ratio, which is higher than DMCRX's 1.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
NEAGX vs. DMCRX - Dividend Comparison
NEAGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.43%, less than DMCRX's 10.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DMCRX Driehaus Micro Cap Growth Fund | 10.47% | 13.72% | 3.86% | 0.87% | 8.20% | 48.23% | 19.79% | 14.70% | 33.22% | 8.91% | 0.00% | 4.20% |
NEAGX Needham Aggressive Growth Fund | 1.43% | 2.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 7.10% | 3.91% | 10.64% | 16.57% | 5.17% | 6.72% | 11.88% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NEAGX and DMCRX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NEAGX has higher volatility (13.68%) compared to DMCRX (8.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NEAGX dropped -41.80% vs DMCRX's -46.68%.
DMCRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs 2.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NEAGX and DMCRX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer