NE vs. TUSK
NE (Noble Corporation) and TUSK (Mammoth Energy Services, Inc.) are both stocks. NE operates in Oil & Gas Drilling (Energy), while TUSK operates in Conglomerates (Industrials). Over the past 5 years, NE returned 17.16%/yr vs -3.15%/yr for TUSK. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
NE vs. TUSK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NE achieves a 69.84% return, which is significantly lower than TUSK's 77.84% return.
NE
- 1D
- 1.73%
- 1M
- -10.32%
- YTD
- 69.84%
- 6M
- 61.33%
- 1Y
- 70.26%
- 3Y*
- 13.81%
- 5Y*
- 17.16%
- 10Y*
- —
TUSK
- 1D
- 3.13%
- 1M
- 2.81%
- YTD
- 77.84%
- 6M
- 85.88%
- 1Y
- 21.85%
- 3Y*
- -10.70%
- 5Y*
- -3.15%
- 10Y*
- —
NE vs. TUSK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NE Noble Corporation | 69.84% | -3.21% | -31.57% | 29.54% | 52.00% | 1.27% |
TUSK Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. | 77.84% | -38.33% | -32.74% | -48.44% | 375.27% | -51.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between NE and TUSK is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2021 | 0.35 |
Fundamentals
NE:
$7.55B
TUSK:
$159.01M
NE:
$1.43
TUSK:
-$1.47
NE:
2.35
TUSK:
2.54
NE:
1.65
TUSK:
0.60
NE:
$3.20B
TUSK:
$62.70M
NE:
$716.15M
TUSK:
$9.65M
NE:
$1.11B
TUSK:
-$14.10M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NE vs. TUSK — Risk / Return Rank
NE
TUSK
NE vs. TUSK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Noble Corporation (NE) and Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (TUSK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NE | TUSK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.11 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.28 | 0.41 | +3.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.03 | 0.74 | +8.29 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NE vs. TUSK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NE drawdown since its inception was -63.16%, smaller than the maximum TUSK drawdown of -98.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NE and TUSK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NE | TUSK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.16% | -98.55% | +35.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.56% | -42.52% | +25.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -63.16% | -69.27% | +6.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.16% | -80.00% | +16.84% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.75% | -91.77% | +79.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.49% | -73.03% | +53.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.83% | 23.68% | -15.85% |
Volatility
NE vs. TUSK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Noble Corporation (NE) is 10.86%, while Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (TUSK) has a volatility of 22.47%. This indicates that NE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TUSK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NE | TUSK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.86% | 22.47% | -11.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.03% | 55.18% | -26.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.86% | 66.95% | -26.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.44% | 72.68% | -29.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 43.39% | 87.23% | -43.84% |
Dividends
NE vs. TUSK - Dividend Comparison
NE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.26%, while TUSK has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NE Noble Corporation | 4.26% | 7.08% | 5.73% | 1.45% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TUSK Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 11.36% | 1.39% |
Financials
NE vs. TUSK - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Noble Corporation and Mammoth Energy Services, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
NE vs. TUSK - Profitability Comparison
NE - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Noble Corporation reported a gross profit of 305.45M and revenue of 785.69M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 38.9%.
TUSK - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. reported a gross profit of 15.78M and revenue of 22.03M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 71.6%.
NE - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Noble Corporation reported an operating income of 225.31M and revenue of 785.69M, resulting in an operating margin of 28.7%.
TUSK - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. reported an operating income of 4.68M and revenue of 22.03M, resulting in an operating margin of 21.3%.
NE - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Noble Corporation reported a net income of 120.73M and revenue of 785.69M, resulting in a net margin of 15.4%.
TUSK - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. reported a net income of 5.19M and revenue of 22.03M, resulting in a net margin of 23.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
NE and TUSK have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TUSK has higher volatility (22.47%) compared to NE (10.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NE dropped -63.16% vs TUSK's -98.55%.
NE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NE and TUSK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer