NE vs. PTEN

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Noble Corporation (NE) and Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. (PTEN).

Performance

NE vs. PTEN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Noble Corporation (NE) and Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. (PTEN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

NE vs. PTEN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
NE Noble Corporation	73.64%	-3.21%	-31.57%	29.54%	52.00%	0.24%
PTEN Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc.	71.41%	-22.08%	-20.99%	-34.18%	101.74%	-19.39%

Fundamentals

Market Cap NE : $7.77B PTEN : $3.93B
EPS NE : $1.35 PTEN : -$0.24
PB Ratio NE : 1.71 PTEN : 1.22
Total Revenue (TTM) NE : $0.00 PTEN : $4.83B
Gross Profit (TTM) NE : $0.00 PTEN : $171.88M
EBITDA (TTM) NE : $583.40M PTEN : $872.53M

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with NE having a 73.64% return and PTEN slightly lower at 71.41%.

NE

• 1D: -1.16%
• 1M: 6.65%
• YTD: 73.64%
• 6M: 70.53%
• 1Y: 111.09%
• 3Y*: 12.49%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PTEN

• 1D: -4.43%
• 1M: 17.35%
• YTD: 71.41%
• 6M: 97.75%
• 1Y: 30.38%
• 3Y*: -0.21%
• 5Y*: 10.17%
• 10Y*: -2.69%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

NE vs. PTEN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NE

NE Risk / Return Rank: 91
NE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
NE Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
NE Omega Ratio Rank: 88
NE Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
NE Martin Ratio Rank: 93

PTEN

PTEN Risk / Return Rank: 57
PTEN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
PTEN Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
PTEN Omega Ratio Rank: 57
PTEN Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
PTEN Martin Ratio Rank: 54

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NE vs. PTEN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Noble Corporation (NE) and Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. (PTEN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NE	PTEN	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.26	0.52	+1.74
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.68	1.05	+1.63
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.15	+0.22
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.77	0.87	+3.89
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	13.64	1.25	+12.40
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NE vs. PTEN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NE Sharpe Ratio is 2.26, which is higher than the PTEN Sharpe Ratio of 0.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NE and PTEN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NE	PTEN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.26	0.52	+1.74
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.19	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	-0.04	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.43	0.15	+0.27

Correlation

The correlation between NE and PTEN is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

NE vs. PTEN - Dividend Comparison

NE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.12%, more than PTEN's 3.29% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NE Noble Corporation	4.12%	7.08%	5.73%	1.45%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PTEN Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc.	3.29%	5.24%	3.87%	2.96%	1.19%	0.95%	1.90%	1.52%	1.35%	0.35%	0.59%	2.65%

Drawdowns

NE vs. PTEN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NE drawdown since its inception was -63.16%, smaller than the maximum PTEN drawdown of -95.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NE and PTEN.

Drawdown Indicators

	NE	PTEN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-63.16%	-95.13%	+31.97%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-23.83%	-37.74%	+13.91%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-70.93%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-94.02%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.67%	-65.26%	+62.59%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.04%	-42.16%	+22.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.64%	26.42%	-17.78%

Volatility

NE vs. PTEN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Noble Corporation (NE) is 9.37%, while Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. (PTEN) has a volatility of 11.28%. This indicates that NE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PTEN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NE	PTEN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.37%	11.28%	-1.91%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	29.70%	32.79%	-3.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	49.56%	58.57%	-9.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	43.59%	55.18%	-11.59%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	43.59%	61.98%	-18.39%

Financials

NE vs. PTEN - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Noble Corporation and Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

NE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Noble Corporation reported a gross profit of -676.78M and revenue of -2.52B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.8%.

PTEN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.15B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

NE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Noble Corporation reported an operating income of 42.56M and revenue of -2.52B, resulting in an operating margin of -1.7%.

PTEN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. reported an operating income of -235.00K and revenue of 1.15B, resulting in an operating margin of -0.0%.

NE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Noble Corporation reported a net income of 86.64M and revenue of -2.52B, resulting in a net margin of -3.4%.

PTEN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. reported a net income of -9.09M and revenue of 1.15B, resulting in a net margin of -0.8%.