NE vs. RIG
NE (Noble Corporation) and RIG (Transocean Ltd.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Oil & Gas Drilling industry within the Energy sector. Over the past 5 years, NE returned 14.96%/yr vs 4.65%/yr for RIG. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
NE vs. RIG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NE achieves a 53.27% return, which is significantly higher than RIG's 30.99% return.
NE
- 1D
- 1.61%
- 1M
- -17.68%
- YTD
- 53.27%
- 6M
- 52.51%
- 1Y
- 55.78%
- 3Y*
- 10.73%
- 5Y*
- 14.96%
- 10Y*
- —
RIG
- 1D
- 1.88%
- 1M
- -20.56%
- YTD
- 30.99%
- 6M
- 34.91%
- 1Y
- 85.91%
- 3Y*
- -3.34%
- 5Y*
- 4.65%
- 10Y*
- -7.08%
NE vs. RIG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NE Noble Corporation | 53.27% | -3.21% | -31.57% | 29.54% | 52.00% | 1.27% |
RIG Transocean Ltd. | 30.99% | 10.13% | -40.94% | 39.25% | 65.22% | -33.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between NE and RIG is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2021 | 0.71 |
The correlation between NE and RIG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.
Fundamentals
NE:
$6.82B
RIG:
$6.08B
NE:
$1.43
RIG:
-$2.85
NE:
2.12
RIG:
1.72
NE:
1.49
RIG:
0.74
NE:
$3.20B
RIG:
$3.06B
NE:
$716.15M
RIG:
$1.97B
NE:
$1.11B
RIG:
-$2.10B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NE vs. RIG — Risk / Return Rank
NE
RIG
NE vs. RIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Noble Corporation (NE) and Transocean Ltd. (RIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NE | RIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.27 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.49 | 2.88 | -0.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.79 | 10.41 | -3.62 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NE vs. RIG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NE drawdown since its inception was -63.16%, smaller than the maximum RIG drawdown of -99.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NE and RIG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NE | RIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.16% | -99.47% | +36.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.51% | -29.95% | +7.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -63.16% | -75.80% | +12.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.16% | -75.80% | +12.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -95.77% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.26% | -95.74% | +74.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.49% | -57.18% | +37.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.27% | 8.39% | -0.12% |
Volatility
NE vs. RIG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Noble Corporation (NE) is 11.12%, while Transocean Ltd. (RIG) has a volatility of 14.02%. This indicates that NE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RIG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NE | RIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.12% | 14.02% | -2.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.60% | 38.29% | -9.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 41.48% | 54.64% | -13.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.51% | 62.55% | -19.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 43.40% | 74.56% | -31.16% |
Dividends
NE vs. RIG - Dividend Comparison
NE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.72%, while RIG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NE Noble Corporation | 4.72% | 7.08% | 5.73% | 1.45% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RIG Transocean Ltd. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 8.48% |
Financials
NE vs. RIG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Noble Corporation and Transocean Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
NE and RIG have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RIG has higher volatility (14.02%) compared to NE (11.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NE dropped -63.16% vs RIG's -99.47%.
RIG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NE and RIG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer