PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NE vs. CMCX.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NE vs. CMCX.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Noble Corporation (NE) and CMC Markets plc (CMCX.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

NE is traded in USD, while CMCX.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CMCX.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NE achieves a 69.84% return, which is significantly higher than CMCX.L's 54.48% return.


NE

1D
1.73%
1M
-10.32%
YTD
69.84%
6M
61.33%
1Y
70.26%
3Y*
13.81%
5Y*
17.16%
10Y*

CMCX.L

1D
-0.05%
1M
23.12%
YTD
54.48%
6M
63.17%
1Y
90.70%
3Y*
49.85%
5Y*
2.61%
10Y*
9.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NE vs. CMCX.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
NE
Noble Corporation
69.84%-3.21%-31.57%29.54%52.00%1.27%
CMCX.L
CMC Markets plc
54.48%36.76%140.02%-48.87%-20.49%-44.97%

Correlation

The correlation between NE and CMCX.L is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2021

0.14

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NE:

$7.55B

CMCX.L:

£1.30B

EPS

NE:

$1.43

CMCX.L:

£0.50

PE Ratio

NE:

32.85

CMCX.L:

9.36

PEG Ratio

NE:

8.94

CMCX.L:

1.23

PS Ratio

NE:

2.35

CMCX.L:

1.69

PB Ratio

NE:

1.65

CMCX.L:

2.84

Total Revenue (TTM)

NE:

$3.20B

CMCX.L:

£755.33M

Gross Profit (TTM)

NE:

$716.15M

CMCX.L:

£533.42M

EBITDA (TTM)

NE:

$1.11B

CMCX.L:

£232.99M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NE vs. CMCX.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NE
NE Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
NE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
NE Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
NE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
NE Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

CMCX.L
CMCX.L Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
CMCX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMCX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMCX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
CMCX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMCX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NE vs. CMCX.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Noble Corporation (NE) and CMC Markets plc (CMCX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NECMCX.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.46

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.28

4.19

+0.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.03

10.78

-1.75

NE vs. CMCX.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NE Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is comparable to the CMCX.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NE and CMCX.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NE vs. CMCX.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NE drawdown since its inception was -63.16%, smaller than the maximum CMCX.L drawdown of -82.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NE and CMCX.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NECMCX.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.16%

-82.48%

+19.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.56%

-20.24%

+3.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-63.16%

-45.82%

-17.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-63.16%

-80.36%

+17.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-82.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.75%

-0.05%

-12.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.49%

-43.80%

+24.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.83%

7.88%

-0.05%

Volatility

NE vs. CMCX.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Noble Corporation (NE) is 10.86%, while CMC Markets plc (CMCX.L) has a volatility of 17.57%. This indicates that NE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CMCX.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NECMCX.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.86%

17.57%

-6.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.03%

25.50%

+3.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.86%

43.41%

-2.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

43.44%

48.29%

-4.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

43.39%

47.85%

-4.46%

Dividends

NE vs. CMCX.L - Dividend Comparison

NE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.26%, more than CMCX.L's 2.97% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
CMCX.L
CMC Markets plc
2.97%4.62%4.19%4.67%5.53%9.46%5.47%2.41%6.94%5.95%
NE
Noble Corporation
4.26%7.08%5.73%1.45%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

NE vs. CMCX.L - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Noble Corporation and CMC Markets plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B20222023202420252026
785.69M
217.26M
(NE) Total Revenue
(CMCX.L) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. NE values in USD, CMCX.L values in GBP

NE vs. CMCX.L - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Noble Corporation and CMC Markets plc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
38.9%
86.6%
Portfolio components
NE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Noble Corporation reported a gross profit of 305.45M and revenue of 785.69M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 38.9%.

CMCX.L - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CMC Markets plc reported a gross profit of 188.08M and revenue of 217.26M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 86.6%.

NE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Noble Corporation reported an operating income of 225.31M and revenue of 785.69M, resulting in an operating margin of 28.7%.

CMCX.L - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CMC Markets plc reported an operating income of 57.64M and revenue of 217.26M, resulting in an operating margin of 26.5%.

NE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Noble Corporation reported a net income of 120.73M and revenue of 785.69M, resulting in a net margin of 15.4%.

CMCX.L - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CMC Markets plc reported a net income of 38.42M and revenue of 217.26M, resulting in a net margin of 17.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


NE and CMCX.L have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NE and CMCX.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer