PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FARX vs. FGSM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FARX vs. FGSM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Frontier Asset Absolute Return ETF (FARX) and Frontier Asset Global Small Cap Equity ETF (FGSM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FARX achieves a 8.85% return, which is significantly lower than FGSM's 15.95% return.


FARX

1D
0.26%
1M
1.45%
6M
5.21%
YTD
8.85%
1Y
18.36%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.25%

FGSM

1D
-0.22%
1M
-0.06%
6M
9.69%
YTD
15.95%
1Y
30.24%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
23.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$13.77K$28.36K$41.16K
$98.06K$85.57K$284.42K

FARX vs. FGSM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
FARX
Frontier Asset Absolute Return ETF
8.85%10.61%0.04%
FGSM
Frontier Asset Global Small Cap Equity ETF
15.95%21.33%-0.27%

Correlation

The correlation between FARX and FGSM is 0.56, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2024

0.54

The correlation between FARX and FGSM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FARX vs. FGSM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FARX
FARX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
FARX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FARX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
FARX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
FARX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
FARX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

FGSM
FGSM Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
FGSM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGSM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGSM Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
FGSM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGSM Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FARX vs. FGSM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Frontier Asset Absolute Return ETF (FARX) and Frontier Asset Global Small Cap Equity ETF (FGSM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FARXFGSMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.34

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.04

2.98

+3.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.24

11.69

+6.55

FARX vs. FGSM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FARX Sharpe Ratio is 2.46, which is comparable to the FGSM Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FARX and FGSM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FARX vs. FGSM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FARX drawdown since its inception was -5.83%, smaller than the maximum FGSM drawdown of -17.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FARX and FGSM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FARXFGSMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.83%

-17.72%

+11.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.99%

-9.84%

+6.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.99%

-0.85%

-0.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.08%

-2.08%

+1.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.99%

2.51%

-1.52%

Volatility

FARX vs. FGSM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Frontier Asset Absolute Return ETF (FARX) is 1.70%, while Frontier Asset Global Small Cap Equity ETF (FGSM) has a volatility of 3.70%. This indicates that FARX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FGSM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FARXFGSMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.70%

3.70%

-2.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.60%

11.67%

-6.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.36%

15.15%

-7.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.99%

17.48%

-10.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.99%

17.48%

-10.49%

FARX vs. FGSM - Expense Ratio Comparison

FARX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than FGSM's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

FARX vs. FGSM - Dividend Comparison

FARX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.87%, more than FGSM's 1.29% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
FARX
Frontier Asset Absolute Return ETF
2.87%3.25%0.19%
FGSM
Frontier Asset Global Small Cap Equity ETF
1.29%1.56%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FARX and FGSM have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FGSM has higher volatility (3.70%) compared to FARX (1.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FARX dropped -5.83% vs FGSM's -17.72%.

On 1-year performance, FGSM leads with 30.24% vs 18.36% for FARX. On fees, FGSM is cheaper at 0.90% per year. On volatility, FARX has been the lower-risk option at 1.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FGSM has performed better with a 30.24% return vs 18.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FGSM is cheaper with a 0.90% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for FARX.

FARX has the higher dividend yield at 2.87%, compared with 1.29% for FGSM.

FARX is categorized as Multistrategy, while FGSM is Global Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for FARX and 0.90% for FGSM.

FARX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FARX and FGSM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer