NDOW vs. ELM

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

NDOW (Anydrus Advantage ETF) and ELM (Elm Market Navigator ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NDOW is a Global Allocation fund actively managed by Anydrus, while ELM is a Tactical Allocation fund actively managed by Elm. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, NDOW returned 12.87% vs 16.21% for ELM. Their correlation of 0.89 means they have usually moved in the same direction. NDOW charges 2.15%/yr vs 0.24%/yr for ELM.

Performance

NDOW vs. ELM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Anydrus Advantage ETF (NDOW) and Elm Market Navigator ETF (ELM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NDOW achieves a 4.81% return, which is significantly lower than ELM's 7.06% return.

NDOW

• 1D: 0.22%
• 1M: -1.56%
• 6M: 1.76%
• YTD: 4.81%
• 1Y: 12.87%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 7.81%

ELM

• 1D: 0.39%
• 1M: 0.02%
• 6M: 4.28%
• YTD: 7.06%
• 1Y: 16.21%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 13.11%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ELM Elm Market Navigator ETF	$351.63K	$455.82K	$575.19K
NDOW Anydrus Advantage ETF	$318.16K	$248.70K	$289.75K

NDOW vs. ELM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
NDOW Anydrus Advantage ETF	4.81%	11.61%
ELM Elm Market Navigator ETF	7.06%	11.88%

Correlation

The correlation between NDOW and ELM is 0.90, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2025	0.89

The correlation between NDOW and ELM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

NDOW vs. ELM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NDOW

NDOW Risk / Return Rank: 51
NDOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
NDOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
NDOW Omega Ratio Rank: 52
NDOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
NDOW Martin Ratio Rank: 52

ELM

ELM Risk / Return Rank: 68
ELM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
ELM Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
ELM Omega Ratio Rank: 72
ELM Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
ELM Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NDOW vs. ELM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Anydrus Advantage ETF (NDOW) and Elm Market Navigator ETF (ELM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NDOW	ELM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.30	1.62	-0.32
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.79	2.26	-0.47
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.30	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.75	2.10	-0.35
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.13	8.42	-2.29

NDOW vs. ELM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NDOW Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is comparable to the ELM Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NDOW and ELM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NDOW vs. ELM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NDOW drawdown since its inception was -8.76%, roughly equal to the maximum ELM drawdown of -9.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NDOW and ELM.

Drawdown Indicators

	NDOW	ELM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.76%	-9.02%	+0.26%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.17%	-7.52%	+0.35%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.83%	-1.04%	-2.79%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.48%	-1.32%	-0.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.05%	1.88%	+0.17%

Volatility

NDOW vs. ELM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Anydrus Advantage ETF (NDOW) is 1.82%, while Elm Market Navigator ETF (ELM) has a volatility of 2.24%. This indicates that NDOW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ELM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NDOW	ELM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.82%	2.24%	-0.42%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.29%	8.17%	+0.12%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.72%	9.80%	-0.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.03%	10.26%	-1.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.03%	10.26%	-1.23%

NDOW vs. ELM - Expense Ratio Comparison

NDOW has a 2.15% expense ratio, which is higher than ELM's 0.24% expense ratio.

Dividends

NDOW vs. ELM - Dividend Comparison

NDOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, less than ELM's 2.53% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
ELM Elm Market Navigator ETF	2.53%	2.71%	0.00%
NDOW Anydrus Advantage ETF	1.18%	1.24%	1.39%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NDOW and ELM in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.90, NDOW and ELM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, NDOW or ELM?

ELM has higher volatility (2.24%) compared to NDOW (1.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NDOW dropped -8.76% vs ELM's -9.02%.

Which ETF is better, NDOW or ELM?

On 1-year performance, ELM leads with 16.21% vs 12.87% for NDOW. On fees, ELM is cheaper at 0.24% per year. On volatility, NDOW has been the lower-risk option at 1.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NDOW or ELM?

Over the 1-year period, ELM has performed better with a 16.21% return vs 12.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NDOW or ELM?

ELM is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 2.15% for NDOW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NDOW or ELM?

ELM has the higher dividend yield at 2.53%, compared with 1.18% for NDOW.

What is the main difference between NDOW and ELM?

NDOW is categorized as Global Allocation, while ELM is Tactical Allocation. They also come from different issuers: Anydrus and Elm. Their fees differ too: 2.15% for NDOW and 0.24% for ELM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ELM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs 1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.