PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NDMO vs. ARLP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NDMO vs. ARLP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Dynamic Municipal Opportunities Fund (NDMO) and Alliance Resource Partners, L.P. (ARLP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NDMO achieves a 6.10% return, which is significantly lower than ARLP's 11.57% return.


NDMO

1D
0.19%
1M
0.18%
6M
3.03%
YTD
6.10%
1Y
9.58%
3Y*
6.19%
5Y*
-3.42%
10Y*

ARLP

1D
1.31%
1M
-1.36%
6M
7.19%
YTD
11.57%
1Y
-0.57%
3Y*
23.09%
5Y*
40.77%
10Y*
13.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NDMO vs. ARLP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
NDMO
Nuveen Dynamic Municipal Opportunities Fund
6.10%8.21%8.31%7.25%-35.45%12.12%6.27%
ARLP
Alliance Resource Partners, L.P.
11.57%-2.45%39.91%18.83%73.34%195.75%35.35%

Correlation

The correlation between NDMO and ARLP is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 27, 2020

0.04

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NDMO:

$624.20M

ARLP:

$3.18B

PB Ratio

NDMO:

1.00

ARLP:

1.54

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NDMO vs. ARLP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NDMO
NDMO Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
NDMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NDMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
NDMO Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
NDMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
NDMO Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

ARLP
ARLP Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
ARLP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARLP Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARLP Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
ARLP Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARLP Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NDMO vs. ARLP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Dynamic Municipal Opportunities Fund (NDMO) and Alliance Resource Partners, L.P. (ARLP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NDMOARLPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.95

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.02

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.61

-0.03

+1.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.10

-0.06

+4.16

NDMO vs. ARLP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NDMO Sharpe Ratio is 0.92, which is higher than the ARLP Sharpe Ratio of -0.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NDMO and ARLP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NDMO vs. ARLP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NDMO drawdown since its inception was -42.54%, smaller than the maximum ARLP drawdown of -90.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NDMO and ARLP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NDMOARLPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.54%

-90.52%

+47.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.96%

-17.62%

+11.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.02%

-20.83%

+4.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.07%

-29.13%

-12.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-85.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.59%

-12.78%

-4.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.36%

-24.29%

+2.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.34%

10.24%

-7.90%

Volatility

NDMO vs. ARLP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nuveen Dynamic Municipal Opportunities Fund (NDMO) is 1.54%, while Alliance Resource Partners, L.P. (ARLP) has a volatility of 6.81%. This indicates that NDMO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ARLP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NDMOARLPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.54%

6.81%

-5.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.84%

16.63%

-8.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.47%

23.13%

-12.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.93%

33.02%

-17.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.48%

49.79%

-34.31%

Dividends

NDMO vs. ARLP - Dividend Comparison

NDMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.18%, less than ARLP's 9.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ARLP
Alliance Resource Partners, L.P.
9.72%11.19%10.65%13.22%7.38%3.16%8.93%19.82%11.94%9.54%8.85%19.74%
NDMO
Nuveen Dynamic Municipal Opportunities Fund
7.18%7.38%7.43%7.80%9.24%5.52%1.46%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

NDMO vs. ARLP - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Nuveen Dynamic Municipal Opportunities Fund and Alliance Resource Partners, L.P.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00100.00B200.00B300.00B400.00B500.00BOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026April
22.60M
516.02B
(NDMO) Total Revenue
(ARLP) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

NDMO vs. ARLP - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Nuveen Dynamic Municipal Opportunities Fund and Alliance Resource Partners, L.P. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%October2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026April
82.7%
0
Portfolio components
NDMO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Nuveen Dynamic Municipal Opportunities Fund reported a gross profit of 18.68M and revenue of 22.60M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 82.7%.

ARLP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Alliance Resource Partners, L.P. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 516.02B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

NDMO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Nuveen Dynamic Municipal Opportunities Fund reported an operating income of 12.55M and revenue of 22.60M, resulting in an operating margin of 55.5%.

ARLP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Alliance Resource Partners, L.P. reported an operating income of 21.86B and revenue of 516.02B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.2%.

NDMO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Nuveen Dynamic Municipal Opportunities Fund reported a net income of 8.10M and revenue of 22.60M, resulting in a net margin of 35.9%.

ARLP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Alliance Resource Partners, L.P. reported a net income of 9.09B and revenue of 516.02B, resulting in a net margin of 1.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


NDMO and ARLP have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ARLP has higher volatility (6.81%) compared to NDMO (1.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NDMO dropped -42.54% vs ARLP's -90.52%.

NDMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.92 vs -0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NDMO and ARLP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer