PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
NDIA.L vs. UC79.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

NDIA.L vs. UC79.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

NDIA.L (iShares MSCI India UCITS ETF USD Acc) and UC79.L (UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Emerging Markets Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - NDIA.L tracks the MSCI India Net Total Return Index while UC79.L tracks the MSCI EM NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, NDIA.L returned 3.44%/yr vs 9.08%/yr for UC79.L. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NDIA.L charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.27%/yr for UC79.L.

Performance

NDIA.L vs. UC79.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI India UCITS ETF USD Acc (NDIA.L) and UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Emerging Markets Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC79.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

NDIA.L is traded in USD, while UC79.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the UC79.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NDIA.L achieves a -13.13% return, which is significantly lower than UC79.L's 32.92% return.

NDIA.L

1D
1.08%
1M
-2.69%
YTD
-13.13%
6M
-12.70%
1Y
-12.23%
3Y*
5.40%
5Y*
3.44%
10Y*
—

UC79.L

1D
-1.59%
1M
7.70%
YTD
32.92%
6M
36.28%
1Y
63.06%
3Y*
27.56%
5Y*
9.08%
10Y*
9.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NDIA.L vs. UC79.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
NDIA.L
iShares MSCI India UCITS ETF USD Acc		-13.13%4.23%9.32%18.74%-7.90%24.99%13.78%7.64%0.05%
UC79.L
UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Emerging Markets Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis		32.92%36.53%9.03%6.48%-21.18%-0.58%16.74%10.98%-3.81%

Correlation

The correlation between NDIA.L and UC79.L is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 31, 2018

0.56

The correlation between NDIA.L and UC79.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

NDIA.L vs. UC79.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
NDIA.L
UC79.L

Financial Services

28.3%
22.6%

Consumer Cyclical

12.5%
11.0%

Industrials

10.3%
8.3%

Energy

9.5%
0.2%

Technology

8.3%
38.0%

Basic Materials

8.0%
3.3%

Consumer Defensive

6.2%
2.8%

Healthcare

6.2%
3.6%

Communication Services

4.7%
8.0%

Utilities

4.6%
1.0%

Real Estate

1.4%
1.3%

Financial Services

NDIA.L
28.3%
UC79.L
22.6%

Consumer Cyclical

NDIA.L
12.5%
UC79.L
11.0%

Industrials

NDIA.L
10.3%
UC79.L
8.3%

Energy

NDIA.L
9.5%
UC79.L
0.2%

Technology

NDIA.L
8.3%
UC79.L
38.0%

Basic Materials

NDIA.L
8.0%
UC79.L
3.3%

Consumer Defensive

NDIA.L
6.2%
UC79.L
2.8%

Healthcare

NDIA.L
6.2%
UC79.L
3.6%

Communication Services

NDIA.L
4.7%
UC79.L
8.0%

Utilities

NDIA.L
4.6%
UC79.L
1.0%

Real Estate

NDIA.L
1.4%
UC79.L
1.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares MSCI India UCITS ETF USD Acc

UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Emerging Markets Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis

Often compared with NDIA.L:
NDIA.L vs. EMV.LNDIA.L vs. DEMS.LNDIA.L vs. FEM.LNDIA.L vs. HDEM.LNDIA.L vs. IWDA.LNDIA.L vs. EIMI.LNDIA.L vs. FLXE.L
Often compared with UC79.L:
UC79.L vs. HMEF.LUC79.L vs. EMV.LUC79.L vs. COPPUC79.L vs. V3AB.LUC79.L vs. HDEM.LUC79.L vs. EUFM.LUC79.L vs. 5ESG.L

Return for Risk

NDIA.L vs. UC79.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
NDIA.L
NDIA.L Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
NDIA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NDIA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
NDIA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
NDIA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
NDIA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
UC79.L
UC79.L Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
UC79.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UC79.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
UC79.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
UC79.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
UC79.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NDIA.L vs. UC79.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI India UCITS ETF USD Acc (NDIA.L) and UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Emerging Markets Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC79.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

NDIA.LUC79.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
-0.70
1.39

-2.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
-0.95
2.21

-3.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.89

1.51

-0.61

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.58

2.31

-2.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.41

4.45

-5.86

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NDIA.L vs. UC79.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NDIA.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.70, which is lower than the UC79.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NDIA.L and UC79.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

NDIA.LUC79.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.70

1.39

-2.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

0.34

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

0.37

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.08

+0.23

Drawdowns

NDIA.L vs. UC79.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NDIA.L drawdown since its inception was -42.98%, smaller than the maximum UC79.L drawdown of -58.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NDIA.L and UC79.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

NDIA.LUC79.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.98%

-58.96%

+15.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.06%

-27.11%

+6.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.48%

-27.11%

+1.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.48%

-36.83%

+11.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-45.20%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.72%

-2.76%

-17.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.78%

-34.81%

+26.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.64%

14.13%

-5.49%

Volatility

NDIA.L vs. UC79.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI India UCITS ETF USD Acc (NDIA.L) is 6.68%, while UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Emerging Markets Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC79.L) has a volatility of 9.25%. This indicates that NDIA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UC79.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

NDIA.LUC79.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.68%

9.25%

-2.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.99%

17.02%

-2.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.33%

45.29%

-27.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.27%

26.67%

-9.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.17%

26.16%

-3.99%

NDIA.L vs. UC79.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

NDIA.L has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than UC79.L's 0.27% expense ratio.

Dividends

NDIA.L vs. UC79.L - Dividend Comparison

NDIA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UC79.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.59%.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NDIA.L
iShares MSCI India UCITS ETF USD Acc		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UC79.L
UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Emerging Markets Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis		1.59%2.14%1.79%2.38%2.06%1.35%1.81%2.11%2.11%1.97%2.15%1.60%

Frequently Asked Questions

NDIA.L and UC79.L have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, UC79.L is cheaper at 0.27% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

UC79.L is cheaper with a 0.27% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for NDIA.L.

NDIA.L tracks MSCI India Net Total Return Index, while UC79.L tracks MSCI EM NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for NDIA.L and 0.27% for UC79.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NDIA.L and UC79.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer