NDIA.L vs. EMV.L
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI India UCITS ETF USD Acc (NDIA.L) and iShares Edge MSCI EM Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF (EMV.L).
NDIA.L and EMV.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. NDIA.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI India Net Total Return Index. It was launched on May 25, 2018. EMV.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI EM NR USD. It was launched on Nov 30, 2012. Both NDIA.L and EMV.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
NDIA.L vs. EMV.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
NDIA.L vs. EMV.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NDIA.L iShares MSCI India UCITS ETF USD Acc | -16.15% | 4.23% | 9.32% | 18.74% | -7.90% | 24.99% | 13.78% | 7.64% | 0.05% |
EMV.L iShares Edge MSCI EM Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF | 1.22% | 12.97% | 8.99% | 6.80% | -14.44% | 4.97% | 7.27% | 7.63% | -5.28% |
Different Trading Currencies
NDIA.L is traded in USD, while EMV.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the EMV.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NDIA.L achieves a -16.15% return, which is significantly lower than EMV.L's 1.22% return.
NDIA.L
- 1D
- 1.95%
- 1M
- -10.50%
- YTD
- -16.15%
- 6M
- -13.19%
- 1Y
- -9.49%
- 3Y*
- 6.93%
- 5Y*
- 4.27%
- 10Y*
- —
EMV.L
- 1D
- 2.45%
- 1M
- -3.84%
- YTD
- 1.22%
- 6M
- 2.98%
- 1Y
- 13.28%
- 3Y*
- 9.26%
- 5Y*
- 2.98%
- 10Y*
- 4.96%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NDIA.L vs. EMV.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
NDIA.L has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than EMV.L's 0.40% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
NDIA.L vs. EMV.L — Risk / Return Rank
NDIA.L
EMV.L
NDIA.L vs. EMV.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI India UCITS ETF USD Acc (NDIA.L) and iShares Edge MSCI EM Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF (EMV.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NDIA.L | EMV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.54 | 1.01 | -1.56 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.67 | 1.38 | -2.05 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 1.20 | -0.28 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.49 | 1.29 | -1.78 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.63 | 4.88 | -6.51 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NDIA.L | EMV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.54 | 1.01 | -1.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 | 0.24 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.35 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | 0.22 | +0.07 |
Correlation
The correlation between NDIA.L and EMV.L is 0.58, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
NDIA.L vs. EMV.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither NDIA.L nor EMV.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
NDIA.L vs. EMV.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NDIA.L drawdown since its inception was -42.98%, which is greater than EMV.L's maximum drawdown of -32.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NDIA.L and EMV.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| NDIA.L | EMV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.98% | -28.68% | -14.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.06% | -7.93% | -13.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.48% | -11.19% | -14.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -22.59% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.47% | -5.60% | -17.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.56% | -5.97% | -2.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.38% | 2.37% | +4.01% |
Volatility
NDIA.L vs. EMV.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI India UCITS ETF USD Acc (NDIA.L) has a higher volatility of 6.92% compared to iShares Edge MSCI EM Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF (EMV.L) at 5.36%. This indicates that NDIA.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMV.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| NDIA.L | EMV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.92% | 5.36% | +1.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.97% | 9.20% | +2.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.42% | 13.03% | +4.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.01% | 12.60% | +4.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.10% | 14.09% | +8.01% |