UC79.L vs. HMEF.L

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Emerging Markets Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC79.L) and HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (HMEF.L).

UC79.L and HMEF.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. UC79.L is a passively managed fund by UBS that tracks the performance of the MSCI EM NR USD. It was launched on Sep 4, 2014. HMEF.L is a passively managed fund by HSBC that tracks the performance of the MSCI EM NR USD. It was launched on Sep 5, 2011. Both UC79.L and HMEF.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

UC79.L vs. HMEF.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Emerging Markets Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC79.L) and HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (HMEF.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

UC79.L vs. HMEF.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
UC79.L UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Emerging Markets Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis	5.98%	26.95%	10.88%	1.14%	-11.74%	0.32%	13.27%	6.70%	-5.60%	20.39%
HMEF.L HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD	6.17%	24.55%	9.08%	2.44%	-10.01%	-2.27%	14.81%	12.74%	-9.63%	25.68%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with UC79.L having a 5.98% return and HMEF.L slightly higher at 6.17%. Over the past 10 years, UC79.L has underperformed HMEF.L with an annualized return of 7.99%, while HMEF.L has yielded a comparatively higher 8.82% annualized return.

UC79.L

• 1D: 2.59%
• 1M: -4.84%
• YTD: 5.98%
• 6M: 13.28%
• 1Y: 34.87%
• 3Y*: 14.70%
• 5Y*: 5.84%
• 10Y*: 7.99%

HMEF.L

• 1D: 3.24%
• 1M: -5.62%
• YTD: 6.17%
• 6M: 10.21%
• 1Y: 30.69%
• 3Y*: 13.43%
• 5Y*: 4.84%
• 10Y*: 8.82%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UC79.L vs. HMEF.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

UC79.L has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is higher than HMEF.L's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

UC79.L

UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Emerging Markets Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis

HMEF.L

HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD

Return for Risk

UC79.L vs. HMEF.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UC79.L

UC79.L Risk / Return Rank: 49
UC79.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
UC79.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
UC79.L Omega Ratio Rank: 86
UC79.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
UC79.L Martin Ratio Rank: 26

HMEF.L

HMEF.L Risk / Return Rank: 85
HMEF.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
HMEF.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
HMEF.L Omega Ratio Rank: 84
HMEF.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
HMEF.L Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UC79.L vs. HMEF.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Emerging Markets Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC79.L) and HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (HMEF.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	UC79.L	HMEF.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.78	1.83	-1.05
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.48	2.37	-0.90
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.35	+0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.37	2.84	-1.47
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.55	10.08	-7.54
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

UC79.L vs. HMEF.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UC79.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.78, which is lower than the HMEF.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UC79.L and HMEF.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	UC79.L	HMEF.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.78	1.83	-1.05
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.24	0.31	-0.07
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.00	0.50	-0.50
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.00	0.33	-0.33

Correlation

The correlation between UC79.L and HMEF.L is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

UC79.L vs. HMEF.L - Dividend Comparison

UC79.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.00%, more than HMEF.L's 1.97% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
UC79.L UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Emerging Markets Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis	2.00%	2.14%	1.79%	2.38%	2.06%	1.35%	1.81%	2.11%	2.11%	1.97%	2.15%	1.60%
HMEF.L HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD	1.97%	1.98%	2.43%	2.58%	2.99%	2.01%	1.66%	2.11%	2.14%	1.61%	1.69%	2.25%

Drawdowns

UC79.L vs. HMEF.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UC79.L drawdown since its inception was -99.87%, which is greater than HMEF.L's maximum drawdown of -31.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UC79.L and HMEF.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	UC79.L	HMEF.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.87%	-31.72%	-68.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-25.91%	-11.07%	-14.84%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.91%	-23.78%	-2.13%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-99.87%	-27.33%	-72.54%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.72%	-7.68%	-92.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-83.67%	-10.09%	-73.58%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.93%	3.12%	+10.81%

Volatility

UC79.L vs. HMEF.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Emerging Markets Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC79.L) is 6.78%, while HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (HMEF.L) has a volatility of 7.28%. This indicates that UC79.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HMEF.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UC79.L	HMEF.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.78%	7.28%	-0.50%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	41.59%	12.74%	+28.85%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	44.42%	16.71%	+27.71%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.65%	15.80%	+8.85%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17,297.31%	17.71%	+17,279.60%