NDIA.L vs. FEM.L
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI India UCITS ETF USD Acc (NDIA.L) and First Trust Emerging Markets AlphaDEX UCITS ETF Acc (FEM.L).
NDIA.L and FEM.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. NDIA.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI India Net Total Return Index. It was launched on May 25, 2018. FEM.L is a passively managed fund by First Trust that tracks the performance of the MSCI EM NR USD. It was launched on Apr 9, 2013. Both NDIA.L and FEM.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
NDIA.L vs. FEM.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
NDIA.L vs. FEM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NDIA.L iShares MSCI India UCITS ETF USD Acc | -16.15% | 4.23% | 9.32% | 18.74% | -7.90% | 24.99% | 13.78% | 7.64% | 0.05% |
FEM.L First Trust Emerging Markets AlphaDEX UCITS ETF Acc | 10.19% | 27.40% | 3.37% | 9.71% | -14.08% | 7.73% | -1.00% | 19.72% | -15.14% |
Different Trading Currencies
NDIA.L is traded in USD, while FEM.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the FEM.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NDIA.L achieves a -16.15% return, which is significantly lower than FEM.L's 10.19% return.
NDIA.L
- 1D
- 1.95%
- 1M
- -10.50%
- YTD
- -16.15%
- 6M
- -13.19%
- 1Y
- -9.49%
- 3Y*
- 6.93%
- 5Y*
- 4.27%
- 10Y*
- —
FEM.L
- 1D
- 2.72%
- 1M
- -3.38%
- YTD
- 10.19%
- 6M
- 12.66%
- 1Y
- 34.75%
- 3Y*
- 16.96%
- 5Y*
- 6.80%
- 10Y*
- 8.29%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NDIA.L vs. FEM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
NDIA.L has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than FEM.L's 0.80% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
NDIA.L vs. FEM.L — Risk / Return Rank
NDIA.L
FEM.L
NDIA.L vs. FEM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI India UCITS ETF USD Acc (NDIA.L) and First Trust Emerging Markets AlphaDEX UCITS ETF Acc (FEM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NDIA.L | FEM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.54 | 1.84 | -2.38 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.67 | 2.25 | -2.93 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 1.34 | -0.42 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.49 | 2.94 | -3.43 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.63 | 12.45 | -14.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NDIA.L | FEM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.54 | 1.84 | -2.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 | 0.37 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.41 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | 0.25 | +0.04 |
Correlation
The correlation between NDIA.L and FEM.L is 0.51, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
NDIA.L vs. FEM.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither NDIA.L nor FEM.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
NDIA.L vs. FEM.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NDIA.L drawdown since its inception was -42.98%, smaller than the maximum FEM.L drawdown of -45.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NDIA.L and FEM.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| NDIA.L | FEM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.98% | -35.42% | -7.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.06% | -11.09% | -9.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.48% | -17.83% | -7.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.42% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.47% | -2.65% | -20.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.56% | -9.09% | +0.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.38% | 2.50% | +3.88% |
Volatility
NDIA.L vs. FEM.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI India UCITS ETF USD Acc (NDIA.L) has a higher volatility of 6.92% compared to First Trust Emerging Markets AlphaDEX UCITS ETF Acc (FEM.L) at 6.11%. This indicates that NDIA.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FEM.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| NDIA.L | FEM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.92% | 6.11% | +0.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.97% | 13.45% | -1.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.42% | 18.82% | -1.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.01% | 18.19% | -1.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.10% | 20.12% | +1.98% |