NDAA vs. BPH

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

NDAA (Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF) and BPH (BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NDAA is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by Ned Davis Research, while BPH is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by Precidian. Both are actively managed. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NDAA charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for BPH.

Performance

NDAA vs. BPH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF (NDAA) and BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF (BPH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

NDAA

• 1D: 0.28%
• 1M: -2.45%
• YTD: 8.00%
• 6M: 7.27%
• 1Y: 20.40%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BPH

• 1D: -0.07%
• 1M: -9.18%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NDAA vs. BPH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
NDAA Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF	-1.72%
BPH BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF	-8.99%

Correlation

The correlation between NDAA and BPH is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2026	0.02

Return for Risk

NDAA vs. BPH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NDAA

NDAA Risk / Return Rank: 62
NDAA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
NDAA Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
NDAA Omega Ratio Rank: 61
NDAA Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
NDAA Martin Ratio Rank: 68

BPH

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NDAA vs. BPH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF (NDAA) and BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF (BPH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NDAA	BPH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.81	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.48	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.69	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.89	—	—

Drawdowns

NDAA vs. BPH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NDAA drawdown since its inception was -13.50%, which is greater than BPH's maximum drawdown of -12.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NDAA and BPH.

Drawdown Indicators

	NDAA	BPH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.50%	-12.06%	-1.44%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.62%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.26%	-12.06%	+8.80%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.96%	-3.99%	+2.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.88%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	NDAA	BPH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.47%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.19%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.31%	25.57%	-14.26%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.19%	25.57%	-13.38%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.19%	25.57%	-13.38%

NDAA vs. BPH - Expense Ratio Comparison

NDAA has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than BPH's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

NDAA vs. BPH - Dividend Comparison

NDAA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.51%, more than BPH's 0.55% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
BPH BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF	0.55%	0.00%	0.00%
NDAA Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF	2.51%	2.71%	0.83%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NDAA and BPH in my portfolio?

NDAA and BPH have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, NDAA or BPH?

On fees, BPH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, NDAA or BPH?

BPH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for NDAA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NDAA or BPH?

NDAA has the higher dividend yield at 2.51%, compared with 0.55% for BPH.

What is the main difference between NDAA and BPH?

NDAA is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while BPH is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Ned Davis Research and Precidian. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for NDAA and 0.19% for BPH.