NDAA vs. INCM

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

NDAA (Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF) and INCM (Franklin Income Focus ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, NDAA returned 21.73% vs 13.86% for INCM. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NDAA charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for INCM.

Performance

NDAA vs. INCM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF (NDAA) and Franklin Income Focus ETF (INCM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NDAA achieves a 8.02% return, which is significantly higher than INCM's 6.27% return.

NDAA

• 1D: -1.66%
• 1M: -1.70%
• YTD: 8.02%
• 6M: 7.54%
• 1Y: 21.73%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

INCM

• 1D: 0.45%
• 1M: -0.39%
• YTD: 6.27%
• 6M: 6.27%
• 1Y: 13.86%
• 3Y*: 10.76%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NDAA vs. INCM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
NDAA Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF	8.02%	14.00%	-1.48%
INCM Franklin Income Focus ETF	6.27%	13.07%	-3.02%

Correlation

The correlation between NDAA and INCM is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.62
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2024	0.66

The correlation between NDAA and INCM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

NDAA vs. INCM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NDAA

NDAA Risk / Return Rank: 65
NDAA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
NDAA Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
NDAA Omega Ratio Rank: 64
NDAA Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
NDAA Martin Ratio Rank: 70

INCM

INCM Risk / Return Rank: 85
INCM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
INCM Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
INCM Omega Ratio Rank: 83
INCM Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
INCM Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NDAA vs. INCM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF (NDAA) and Franklin Income Focus ETF (INCM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NDAA	INCM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.92	2.52	-0.60
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.62	3.60	-0.98
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.47	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.86	4.36	-1.50
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.75	18.05	-6.30

NDAA vs. INCM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NDAA Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is comparable to the INCM Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NDAA and INCM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NDAA vs. INCM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NDAA drawdown since its inception was -13.50%, which is greater than INCM's maximum drawdown of -7.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NDAA and INCM.

Drawdown Indicators

	NDAA	INCM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.50%	-7.84%	-5.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.62%	-3.19%	-4.43%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-7.84%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.23%	-0.92%	-2.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.96%	-1.08%	-0.88%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.85%	0.77%	+1.08%

Volatility

NDAA vs. INCM - Volatility Comparison

Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF (NDAA) has a higher volatility of 4.54% compared to Franklin Income Focus ETF (INCM) at 2.44%. This indicates that NDAA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INCM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NDAA	INCM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.54%	2.44%	+2.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.22%	4.29%	+4.93%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.37%	5.58%	+5.79%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.21%	7.28%	+4.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.21%	7.28%	+4.93%

NDAA vs. INCM - Expense Ratio Comparison

NDAA has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than INCM's 0.38% expense ratio.

Dividends

NDAA vs. INCM - Dividend Comparison

NDAA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.51%, less than INCM's 5.09% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
INCM Franklin Income Focus ETF	5.09%	4.96%	5.06%	3.01%
NDAA Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF	2.51%	2.71%	0.83%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NDAA and INCM in my portfolio?

NDAA and INCM have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NDAA or INCM?

NDAA has higher volatility (4.54%) compared to INCM (2.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NDAA dropped -13.50% vs INCM's -7.84%.

Which ETF is better, NDAA or INCM?

On 1-year performance, NDAA leads with 21.73% vs 13.86% for INCM. On fees, INCM is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, INCM has been the lower-risk option at 2.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NDAA or INCM?

Over the 1-year period, NDAA has performed better with a 21.73% return vs 13.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NDAA or INCM?

INCM is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for NDAA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NDAA or INCM?

INCM has the higher dividend yield at 5.09%, compared with 2.51% for NDAA.

What is the main difference between NDAA and INCM?

They also come from different issuers: Ned Davis Research and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for NDAA and 0.38% for INCM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

INCM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.