NCYF.L vs. TLT
Compare and contrast key facts about CQS New City High Yield Fund (NCYF.L) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT).
TLT is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index. It was launched on Jul 22, 2002.
Performance
NCYF.L vs. TLT - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
NCYF.L vs. TLT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NCYF.L CQS New City High Yield Fund | -1.99% | 8.31% | 12.08% | 4.61% | 3.17% | 16.43% | -5.71% | 14.70% | -2.24% | 12.97% |
TLT iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF | 1.73% | -3.18% | -6.45% | -2.37% | -23.06% | -3.70% | 14.68% | 9.78% | 4.22% | -0.26% |
Different Trading Currencies
NCYF.L is traded in GBp, while TLT is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the TLT values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NCYF.L achieves a -1.99% return, which is significantly lower than TLT's 2.07% return. Over the past 10 years, NCYF.L has outperformed TLT with an annualized return of 7.07%, while TLT has yielded a comparatively lower -0.65% annualized return.
NCYF.L
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- -3.50%
- YTD
- -1.99%
- 6M
- -0.82%
- 1Y
- 5.36%
- 3Y*
- 9.46%
- 5Y*
- 8.17%
- 10Y*
- 7.07%
TLT
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -1.92%
- YTD
- 2.07%
- 6M
- 0.78%
- 1Y
- -3.58%
- 3Y*
- -5.01%
- 5Y*
- -5.00%
- 10Y*
- -0.65%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NCYF.L vs. TLT — Risk / Return Rank
NCYF.L
TLT
NCYF.L vs. TLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CQS New City High Yield Fund (NCYF.L) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NCYF.L | TLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.51 | -0.29 | +0.80 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.76 | -0.32 | +1.08 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 0.96 | +0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.85 | -0.21 | +1.07 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.78 | -0.37 | +4.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NCYF.L | TLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 | -0.29 | +0.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 | -0.30 | +0.91 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.32 | -0.04 | +0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.29 | +0.20 |
Correlation
The correlation between NCYF.L and TLT is -0.05. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
NCYF.L vs. TLT - Dividend Comparison
NCYF.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.09%, more than TLT's 4.53% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NCYF.L CQS New City High Yield Fund | 9.09% | 8.74% | 8.65% | 8.87% | 8.45% | 8.01% | 8.58% | 7.39% | 7.83% | 7.07% | 7.39% | 7.75% |
TLT iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF | 4.53% | 4.43% | 4.30% | 3.38% | 2.67% | 1.50% | 1.50% | 2.27% | 2.63% | 2.43% | 2.60% | 2.61% |
Drawdowns
NCYF.L vs. TLT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NCYF.L drawdown since its inception was -55.45%, which is greater than TLT's maximum drawdown of -50.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NCYF.L and TLT.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| NCYF.L | TLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.45% | -48.35% | -7.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.81% | -9.23% | +3.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.73% | -43.70% | +26.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -55.45% | -48.35% | -7.10% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.88% | -40.23% | +36.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.17% | -13.62% | +9.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.31% | 4.39% | -3.08% |
Volatility
NCYF.L vs. TLT - Volatility Comparison
CQS New City High Yield Fund (NCYF.L) has a higher volatility of 6.18% compared to iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT) at 3.53%. This indicates that NCYF.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| NCYF.L | TLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.18% | 3.53% | +2.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.85% | 7.45% | +0.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.42% | 12.38% | -1.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.52% | 16.49% | -2.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.78% | 17.07% | +4.71% |