PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
NCYF.L vs. CVCG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

NCYF.L vs. CVCG.L

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about CQS New City High Yield Fund (NCYF.L) and CVC Income & Growth Limited (CVCG.L).

Performance

NCYF.L vs. CVCG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in CQS New City High Yield Fund (NCYF.L) and CVC Income & Growth Limited (CVCG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

NCYF.L vs. CVCG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NCYF.L
CQS New City High Yield Fund		-1.99%8.31%12.08%4.61%3.17%16.43%-5.71%14.70%-2.24%12.97%
CVCG.L
CVC Income & Growth Limited		-2.40%7.43%31.28%17.87%-7.57%16.87%0.78%-3.50%0.53%14.77%

Fundamentals

EPS

NCYF.L:

£0.10

CVCG.L:

£0.06

PE Ratio

NCYF.L:

4.83

CVCG.L:

20.30

PEG Ratio

NCYF.L:

0.02

CVCG.L:

0.32

PS Ratio

NCYF.L:

4.06

CVCG.L:

4.14

Total Revenue (TTM)

NCYF.L:

£72.45M

CVCG.L:

£62.39M

Gross Profit (TTM)

NCYF.L:

£72.45M

CVCG.L:

£43.35M

EBITDA (TTM)

NCYF.L:

£0.00

CVCG.L:

£43.05M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NCYF.L achieves a -1.99% return, which is significantly higher than CVCG.L's -2.40% return. Over the past 10 years, NCYF.L has underperformed CVCG.L with an annualized return of 7.07%, while CVCG.L has yielded a comparatively higher 8.12% annualized return.

NCYF.L

1D
0.40%
1M
-3.50%
YTD
-1.99%
6M
-0.82%
1Y
5.36%
3Y*
9.46%
5Y*
8.17%
10Y*
7.07%

CVCG.L

1D
3.67%
1M
-2.16%
YTD
-2.40%
6M
-2.51%
1Y
0.96%
3Y*
15.10%
5Y*
10.43%
10Y*
8.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

CQS New City High Yield Fund

CVC Income & Growth Limited

Often compared with NCYF.L:
NCYF.L vs. XLENCYF.L vs. WIGG.LNCYF.L vs. ACWINCYF.L vs. JEPINCYF.L vs. SHYU.LNCYF.L vs. HYLDNCYF.L vs. TLT
Often compared with CVCG.L:
CVCG.L vs. CSLCVCG.L vs. KKRCVCG.L vs. VOOCVCG.L vs. BIPS.LCVCG.L vs. JEPIXCVCG.L vs. VTCVCG.L vs. WIGG.L

Return for Risk

NCYF.L vs. CVCG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
NCYF.L
NCYF.L Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
NCYF.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NCYF.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
NCYF.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
NCYF.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
NCYF.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
CVCG.L
CVCG.L Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
CVCG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CVCG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
CVCG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
CVCG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
CVCG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NCYF.L vs. CVCG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CQS New City High Yield Fund (NCYF.L) and CVC Income & Growth Limited (CVCG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

NCYF.LCVCG.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.51

0.07

+0.44

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.76

0.20

+0.56

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.03

+0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.85

0.25

+0.60

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.78

1.37

+2.41

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NCYF.L vs. CVCG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NCYF.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.51, which is higher than the CVCG.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NCYF.L and CVCG.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

NCYF.LCVCG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

0.07

+0.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

0.52

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

0.34

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.32

+0.17

Correlation

The correlation between NCYF.L and CVCG.L is 0.12, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

NCYF.L vs. CVCG.L - Dividend Comparison

NCYF.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.09%, more than CVCG.L's 8.59% yield.

TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NCYF.L
CQS New City High Yield Fund		9.09%8.74%8.65%8.87%8.45%8.01%8.58%7.39%7.83%7.07%7.39%7.75%
CVCG.L
CVC Income & Growth Limited		8.59%8.64%8.58%8.08%5.68%4.49%5.14%5.54%5.07%4.64%6.04%4.90%

Drawdowns

NCYF.L vs. CVCG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NCYF.L drawdown since its inception was -55.45%, which is greater than CVCG.L's maximum drawdown of -44.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NCYF.L and CVCG.L.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

NCYF.LCVCG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.45%

-44.77%

-10.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.81%

-10.61%

+4.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.73%

-17.08%

+0.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-55.45%

-44.77%

-10.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.88%

-4.02%

+0.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.17%

-4.08%

-0.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.31%

1.93%

-0.62%

Volatility

NCYF.L vs. CVCG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CQS New City High Yield Fund (NCYF.L) is 6.18%, while CVC Income & Growth Limited (CVCG.L) has a volatility of 10.31%. This indicates that NCYF.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CVCG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

NCYF.LCVCG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.18%

10.31%

-4.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.85%

11.53%

-3.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.42%

14.15%

-3.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.52%

20.08%

-6.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.78%

23.84%

-2.06%

Financials

NCYF.L vs. CVCG.L - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CQS New City High Yield Fund and CVC Income & Growth Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.

Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities

5.00M10.00M15.00M20.00M25.00M20212022202320242025
11.22M
20.28M
(NCYF.L) Total Revenue
(CVCG.L) Total Revenue
Values in GBp except per share items