NCV vs. LBFFX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

NCV (Virtus Convertible and Income Fund) and LBFFX (Lord Abbett Convertible Fund Class F) are both Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds funds. Over the past 10 years, NCV returned 8.43%/yr vs 13.28%/yr for LBFFX. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NCV charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.93%/yr for LBFFX.

Performance

NCV vs. LBFFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus Convertible and Income Fund (NCV) and Lord Abbett Convertible Fund Class F (LBFFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with NCV having a 21.00% return and LBFFX slightly higher at 21.32%. Over the past 10 years, NCV has underperformed LBFFX with an annualized return of 8.43%, while LBFFX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.28% annualized return.

NCV

• 1D: -0.74%
• 1M: 2.20%
• YTD: 21.00%
• 6M: 18.96%
• 1Y: 42.83%
• 3Y*: 22.80%
• 5Y*: 5.04%
• 10Y*: 8.43%

LBFFX

• 1D: 1.18%
• 1M: 2.34%
• YTD: 21.32%
• 6M: 19.19%
• 1Y: 38.31%
• 3Y*: 20.30%
• 5Y*: 7.02%
• 10Y*: 13.28%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NCV vs. LBFFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
NCV Virtus Convertible and Income Fund	21.00%	22.57%	16.18%	12.66%	-34.02%	10.68%	11.64%	24.12%	-17.25%	23.24%
LBFFX Lord Abbett Convertible Fund Class F	21.32%	22.11%	13.82%	7.16%	-23.30%	1.26%	64.16%	24.19%	-5.89%	16.68%

Correlation

The correlation between NCV and LBFFX is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.70
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.66
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.67
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.61
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2007	0.57

The correlation between NCV and LBFFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (all time) to 0.70 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

NCV vs. LBFFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NCV

NCV Risk / Return Rank: 85
NCV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
NCV Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
NCV Omega Ratio Rank: 81
NCV Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
NCV Martin Ratio Rank: 86

LBFFX

LBFFX Risk / Return Rank: 83
LBFFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
LBFFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
LBFFX Omega Ratio Rank: 71
LBFFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
LBFFX Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NCV vs. LBFFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Convertible and Income Fund (NCV) and Lord Abbett Convertible Fund Class F (LBFFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NCV	LBFFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.81	2.47	+0.34
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.65	3.21	+0.44
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.48	1.43	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.78	5.47	-1.69
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.13	19.01	-3.87

NCV vs. LBFFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NCV Sharpe Ratio is 2.81, which is comparable to the LBFFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NCV and LBFFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NCV vs. LBFFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NCV drawdown since its inception was -78.94%, which is greater than LBFFX's maximum drawdown of -41.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NCV and LBFFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	NCV	LBFFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-78.94%	-41.13%	-37.81%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.38%	-7.07%	-4.31%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.80%	-12.15%	-5.65%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-44.60%	-30.86%	-13.74%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-56.18%	-33.61%	-22.57%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.74%	-0.92%	+0.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.86%	-10.29%	-3.57%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.84%	2.03%	+0.81%

Volatility

NCV vs. LBFFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Virtus Convertible and Income Fund (NCV) is 4.05%, while Lord Abbett Convertible Fund Class F (LBFFX) has a volatility of 6.11%. This indicates that NCV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LBFFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NCV	LBFFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.05%	6.11%	-2.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.72%	13.11%	-0.39%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.37%	15.65%	-0.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.62%	13.21%	+7.41%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.86%	13.76%	+11.10%

NCV vs. LBFFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NCV has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than LBFFX's 0.93% expense ratio.

Dividends

NCV vs. LBFFX - Dividend Comparison

NCV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.36%, more than LBFFX's 1.23% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LBFFX Lord Abbett Convertible Fund Class F	1.23%	1.80%	2.22%	1.95%	2.60%	18.44%	16.27%	8.71%	4.91%	2.47%	3.64%	3.38%
NCV Virtus Convertible and Income Fund	9.36%	10.77%	11.76%	12.86%	15.00%	8.75%	9.41%	11.61%	15.03%	11.10%	12.23%	17.69%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NCV and LBFFX in my portfolio?

NCV and LBFFX have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NCV or LBFFX?

LBFFX has higher volatility (6.11%) compared to NCV (4.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NCV dropped -78.94% vs LBFFX's -41.13%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NCV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.81 vs 2.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.