PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LBFFX vs. FPEIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LBFFX vs. FPEIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lord Abbett Convertible Fund Class F (LBFFX) and First Trust Preferred Securities and Income Fund (FPEIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LBFFX achieves a 21.32% return, which is significantly higher than FPEIX's 0.11% return. Over the past 10 years, LBFFX has outperformed FPEIX with an annualized return of 13.28%, while FPEIX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.97% annualized return.


LBFFX

1D
1.18%
1M
2.34%
YTD
21.32%
6M
19.19%
1Y
38.31%
3Y*
20.30%
5Y*
7.02%
10Y*
13.28%

FPEIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.46%
YTD
0.11%
6M
0.66%
1Y
7.33%
3Y*
9.77%
5Y*
2.88%
10Y*
4.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LBFFX vs. FPEIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LBFFX
Lord Abbett Convertible Fund Class F
21.32%22.11%13.82%7.16%-23.30%1.26%64.16%24.19%-5.89%16.68%
FPEIX
First Trust Preferred Securities and Income Fund
0.11%9.48%10.99%5.32%-11.60%4.85%6.01%16.93%-4.31%11.57%

Correlation

The correlation between LBFFX and FPEIX is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2011

0.36

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LBFFX vs. FPEIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LBFFX
LBFFX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
LBFFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LBFFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
LBFFX Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
LBFFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
LBFFX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

FPEIX
FPEIX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
FPEIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FPEIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
FPEIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
FPEIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
FPEIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LBFFX vs. FPEIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Convertible Fund Class F (LBFFX) and First Trust Preferred Securities and Income Fund (FPEIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LBFFXFPEIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.57

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.47

2.13

+3.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.01

8.25

+10.76

LBFFX vs. FPEIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LBFFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is comparable to the FPEIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LBFFX and FPEIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LBFFX vs. FPEIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LBFFX drawdown since its inception was -41.13%, which is greater than FPEIX's maximum drawdown of -27.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LBFFX and FPEIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LBFFXFPEIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.13%

-27.83%

-13.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.07%

-3.62%

-3.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.15%

-4.11%

-8.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.86%

-19.66%

-11.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.61%

-27.83%

-5.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.92%

-1.06%

+0.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.29%

-2.86%

-7.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.03%

0.91%

+1.12%

Volatility

LBFFX vs. FPEIX - Volatility Comparison

Lord Abbett Convertible Fund Class F (LBFFX) has a higher volatility of 6.11% compared to First Trust Preferred Securities and Income Fund (FPEIX) at 0.75%. This indicates that LBFFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FPEIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LBFFXFPEIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.11%

0.75%

+5.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.11%

2.44%

+10.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.65%

3.14%

+12.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.21%

5.25%

+7.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.76%

6.54%

+7.22%

LBFFX vs. FPEIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LBFFX has a 0.93% expense ratio, which is lower than FPEIX's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

LBFFX vs. FPEIX - Dividend Comparison

LBFFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%, less than FPEIX's 5.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FPEIX
First Trust Preferred Securities and Income Fund
5.04%5.40%5.60%5.17%5.30%4.70%4.88%5.36%5.93%5.36%5.66%5.56%
LBFFX
Lord Abbett Convertible Fund Class F
1.23%1.80%2.22%1.95%2.60%18.44%16.27%8.71%4.91%2.47%3.64%3.38%

Frequently Asked Questions


LBFFX and FPEIX have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LBFFX has higher volatility (6.11%) compared to FPEIX (0.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LBFFX dropped -41.13% vs FPEIX's -27.83%.

LBFFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 2.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LBFFX and FPEIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer