LBFFX vs. FACVX
Compare and contrast key facts about Lord Abbett Convertible Fund Class F (LBFFX) and Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class A (FACVX).
LBFFX is managed by Lord Abbett. FACVX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Feb 19, 2009.
Performance
LBFFX vs. FACVX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LBFFX vs. FACVX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LBFFX Lord Abbett Convertible Fund Class F | 1.71% | 22.11% | 13.82% | 7.16% | -23.30% | 1.26% | 64.16% | 24.19% | -5.89% | 16.68% |
FACVX Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class A | 1.33% | 17.95% | 7.92% | 11.06% | -15.59% | 9.63% | 42.09% | 28.21% | -1.59% | 8.77% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LBFFX achieves a 1.71% return, which is significantly higher than FACVX's 1.33% return. Over the past 10 years, LBFFX has outperformed FACVX with an annualized return of 11.61%, while FACVX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.83% annualized return.
LBFFX
- 1D
- -1.66%
- 1M
- -5.44%
- YTD
- 1.71%
- 6M
- 4.82%
- 1Y
- 26.07%
- 3Y*
- 14.05%
- 5Y*
- 2.99%
- 10Y*
- 11.61%
FACVX
- 1D
- -1.69%
- 1M
- -5.61%
- YTD
- 1.33%
- 6M
- 2.42%
- 1Y
- 24.20%
- 3Y*
- 11.28%
- 5Y*
- 5.01%
- 10Y*
- 10.83%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LBFFX vs. FACVX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LBFFX has a 0.93% expense ratio, which is lower than FACVX's 0.97% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
LBFFX vs. FACVX — Risk / Return Rank
LBFFX
FACVX
LBFFX vs. FACVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Convertible Fund Class F (LBFFX) and Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class A (FACVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LBFFX | FACVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.80 | 1.53 | +0.27 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.44 | 2.09 | +0.35 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.28 | +0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.45 | 2.83 | +0.61 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.36 | 10.69 | +1.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LBFFX | FACVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.80 | 1.53 | +0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 | 0.38 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.86 | 0.80 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | 0.92 | -0.31 |
Correlation
The correlation between LBFFX and FACVX is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
LBFFX vs. FACVX - Dividend Comparison
LBFFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%, less than FACVX's 11.04% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LBFFX Lord Abbett Convertible Fund Class F | 1.47% | 1.80% | 2.22% | 1.95% | 2.60% | 18.44% | 16.27% | 8.71% | 4.91% | 2.47% | 3.64% | 3.38% |
FACVX Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class A | 11.04% | 11.18% | 1.85% | 1.86% | 3.48% | 20.42% | 10.56% | 3.04% | 9.55% | 3.89% | 4.62% | 10.02% |
Drawdowns
LBFFX vs. FACVX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LBFFX drawdown since its inception was -41.13%, which is greater than FACVX's maximum drawdown of -25.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LBFFX and FACVX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LBFFX | FACVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.13% | -25.09% | -16.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.07% | -7.75% | +0.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.86% | -24.32% | -6.54% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.61% | -25.09% | -8.52% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.07% | -6.79% | -0.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.40% | -5.81% | -4.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.97% | 2.05% | -0.08% |
Volatility
LBFFX vs. FACVX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Lord Abbett Convertible Fund Class F (LBFFX) is 5.98%, while Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class A (FACVX) has a volatility of 6.32%. This indicates that LBFFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FACVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LBFFX | FACVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.98% | 6.32% | -0.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.02% | 12.07% | -0.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.39% | 15.64% | -1.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.86% | 13.36% | -0.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.50% | 13.51% | -0.01% |