PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NCRLX vs. NBSRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NCRLX vs. NBSRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neuberger Berman Core Bond Fund (NCRLX) and Neuberger Berman Sustainable Equity Fund (NBSRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NCRLX achieves a 0.28% return, which is significantly lower than NBSRX's 10.59% return. Over the past 10 years, NCRLX has underperformed NBSRX with an annualized return of 1.83%, while NBSRX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.30% annualized return.


NCRLX

1D
-0.23%
1M
0.13%
YTD
0.28%
6M
0.29%
1Y
4.64%
3Y*
4.14%
5Y*
-0.07%
10Y*
1.83%

NBSRX

1D
-0.53%
1M
1.89%
YTD
10.59%
6M
16.27%
1Y
27.04%
3Y*
23.84%
5Y*
13.33%
10Y*
14.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NCRLX vs. NBSRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NCRLX
Neuberger Berman Core Bond Fund
0.28%7.24%1.90%5.69%-14.36%-1.07%9.50%9.43%-1.06%3.95%
NBSRX
Neuberger Berman Sustainable Equity Fund
10.59%17.37%28.23%26.76%-18.81%23.30%19.35%25.95%-6.00%18.84%

Correlation

The correlation between NCRLX and NBSRX is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 5, 1995

-0.07

The correlation between NCRLX and NBSRX shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (all time) to 0.27 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NCRLX vs. NBSRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NCRLX
NCRLX Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
NCRLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NCRLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
NCRLX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
NCRLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
NCRLX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

NBSRX
NBSRX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
NBSRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NBSRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
NBSRX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
NBSRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
NBSRX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NCRLX vs. NBSRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman Core Bond Fund (NCRLX) and Neuberger Berman Sustainable Equity Fund (NBSRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NCRLXNBSRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.38

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.80

2.71

-0.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.36

11.66

-6.30

NCRLX vs. NBSRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NCRLX Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is lower than the NBSRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NCRLX and NBSRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NCRLXNBSRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.30

2.06

-0.76

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.01

0.83

-0.84

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

0.82

-0.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.59

-0.10

Drawdowns

NCRLX vs. NBSRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NCRLX drawdown since its inception was -19.21%, smaller than the maximum NBSRX drawdown of -53.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NCRLX and NBSRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NCRLXNBSRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.21%

-53.74%

+34.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.93%

-10.03%

+7.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.39%

-16.28%

+9.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.21%

-25.39%

+6.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.21%

-34.07%

+14.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.05%

-0.94%

-1.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.81%

-7.06%

+3.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.98%

2.32%

-1.34%

Volatility

NCRLX vs. NBSRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Neuberger Berman Core Bond Fund (NCRLX) is 1.35%, while Neuberger Berman Sustainable Equity Fund (NBSRX) has a volatility of 2.94%. This indicates that NCRLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NBSRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NCRLXNBSRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.35%

2.94%

-1.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.94%

10.48%

-7.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.05%

13.19%

-9.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.03%

16.14%

-10.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.00%

17.49%

-12.49%

NCRLX vs. NBSRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NCRLX has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than NBSRX's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

NCRLX vs. NBSRX - Dividend Comparison

NCRLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.70%, more than NBSRX's 2.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NBSRX
Neuberger Berman Sustainable Equity Fund
2.13%2.35%5.88%9.72%10.06%10.35%6.16%9.08%10.03%6.14%4.53%6.40%
NCRLX
Neuberger Berman Core Bond Fund
4.70%4.68%4.76%3.90%2.63%2.47%4.76%3.37%3.00%2.80%3.37%3.15%

Frequently Asked Questions


NCRLX and NBSRX have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NBSRX has higher volatility (2.94%) compared to NCRLX (1.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NCRLX dropped -19.21% vs NBSRX's -53.74%.

NBSRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NCRLX and NBSRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer