PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NCLP.L vs. MLPQ.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

NCLP.L vs. MLPQ.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in WisdomTree Uranium and Nuclear Energy UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (NCLP.L) and Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (MLPQ.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

NCLP.L vs. MLPQ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NCLP.L achieves a 16.41% return, which is significantly lower than MLPQ.L's 20.41% return.


NCLP.L

1D
-0.12%
1M
-12.74%
YTD
16.41%
6M
11.87%
1Y
142.42%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MLPQ.L

1D
-0.53%
1M
5.51%
YTD
20.41%
6M
20.87%
1Y
7.01%
3Y*
17.06%
5Y*
22.41%
10Y*
10.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


NCLP.L vs. MLPQ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

NCLP.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than MLPQ.L's 0.50% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

NCLP.L vs. MLPQ.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NCLP.L
NCLP.L Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
NCLP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NCLP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
NCLP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
NCLP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
NCLP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

MLPQ.L
MLPQ.L Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
MLPQ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MLPQ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
MLPQ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
MLPQ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
MLPQ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NCLP.L vs. MLPQ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Uranium and Nuclear Energy UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (NCLP.L) and Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (MLPQ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NCLP.LMLPQ.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.07

0.37

+2.70

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.42

0.59

+2.83

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.08

+0.35

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.13

0.42

+4.71

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.67

0.72

+13.95

NCLP.L vs. MLPQ.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NCLP.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.07, which is higher than the MLPQ.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NCLP.L and MLPQ.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NCLP.LMLPQ.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.07

0.37

+2.70

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.56

0.19

+2.36

Correlation

The correlation between NCLP.L and MLPQ.L is 0.20, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

NCLP.L vs. MLPQ.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither NCLP.L nor MLPQ.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

NCLP.L vs. MLPQ.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NCLP.L drawdown since its inception was -26.96%, smaller than the maximum MLPQ.L drawdown of -75.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NCLP.L and MLPQ.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


NCLP.LMLPQ.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.96%

-75.62%

+48.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.96%

-16.22%

-10.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-74.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.57%

-0.82%

-14.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.09%

-20.25%

+13.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.43%

9.44%

-0.01%

Volatility

NCLP.L vs. MLPQ.L - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Uranium and Nuclear Energy UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (NCLP.L) has a higher volatility of 14.32% compared to Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (MLPQ.L) at 4.30%. This indicates that NCLP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MLPQ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


NCLP.LMLPQ.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.32%

4.30%

+10.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.88%

9.82%

+26.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

46.22%

18.88%

+27.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

45.84%

19.71%

+26.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

45.84%

27.90%

+17.94%