NCLO vs. NUMI

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

NCLO (Nuveen AA-BBB CLO ETF) and NUMI (Nuveen Municipal Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NCLO is a CLO fund tracking the JP Morgan CLO A Index, while NUMI is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by Nuveen. NCLO is passively managed, while NUMI is actively managed. Over the past year, NCLO returned 5.90% vs 7.75% for NUMI. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NCLO charges 0.26%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for NUMI.

Performance

NCLO vs. NUMI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen AA-BBB CLO ETF (NCLO) and Nuveen Municipal Income ETF (NUMI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NCLO achieves a 1.96% return, which is significantly higher than NUMI's 1.53% return.

NCLO

• 1D: -0.16%
• 1M: 0.61%
• YTD: 1.96%
• 6M: 2.57%
• 1Y: 5.90%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NUMI

• 1D: 0.06%
• 1M: 0.54%
• YTD: 1.53%
• 6M: 1.91%
• 1Y: 7.75%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NCLO vs. NUMI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
NCLO Nuveen AA-BBB CLO ETF	1.96%	5.86%
NUMI Nuveen Municipal Income ETF	1.53%	3.84%

Correlation

The correlation between NCLO and NUMI is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.06
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 24, 2025	0.07

Return for Risk

NCLO vs. NUMI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NCLO

NCLO Risk / Return Rank: 54
NCLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
NCLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
NCLO Omega Ratio Rank: 77
NCLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
NCLO Martin Ratio Rank: 69

NUMI

NUMI Risk / Return Rank: 66
NUMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
NUMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
NUMI Omega Ratio Rank: 81
NUMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
NUMI Martin Ratio Rank: 51

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NCLO vs. NUMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen AA-BBB CLO ETF (NCLO) and Nuveen Municipal Income ETF (NUMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NCLO	NUMI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.63	2.24	-0.61
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.08	3.32	-1.23
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	1.48	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.94	2.76	-0.82
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.85	8.62	+4.23
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NCLO vs. NUMI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NCLO Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is comparable to the NUMI Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NCLO and NUMI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NCLO	NUMI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.63	2.24	-0.61
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.59	0.91	+0.68

Drawdowns

NCLO vs. NUMI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NCLO drawdown since its inception was -3.05%, smaller than the maximum NUMI drawdown of -4.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NCLO and NUMI.

Drawdown Indicators

	NCLO	NUMI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.05%	-4.72%	+1.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.05%	-2.82%	-0.23%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.35%	-0.63%	+0.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.20%	-1.39%	+1.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.46%	0.90%	-0.44%

Volatility

NCLO vs. NUMI - Volatility Comparison

Nuveen AA-BBB CLO ETF (NCLO) has a higher volatility of 1.14% compared to Nuveen Municipal Income ETF (NUMI) at 1.05%. This indicates that NCLO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NUMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NCLO	NUMI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.14%	1.05%	+0.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.46%	2.23%	+1.23%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.64%	3.48%	+0.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.72%	4.39%	-0.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.72%	4.39%	-0.67%

NCLO vs. NUMI - Expense Ratio Comparison

NCLO has a 0.26% expense ratio, which is lower than NUMI's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

NCLO vs. NUMI - Dividend Comparison

NCLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.78%, more than NUMI's 3.66% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
NCLO Nuveen AA-BBB CLO ETF	5.78%	6.09%	0.35%
NUMI Nuveen Municipal Income ETF	3.66%	3.44%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NCLO and NUMI in my portfolio?

NCLO and NUMI have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NCLO or NUMI?

NCLO has higher volatility (1.14%) compared to NUMI (1.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NCLO dropped -3.05% vs NUMI's -4.72%.

Which ETF is better, NCLO or NUMI?

On 1-year performance, NUMI leads with 7.75% vs 5.90% for NCLO. On fees, NCLO is cheaper at 0.26% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NCLO or NUMI?

Over the 1-year period, NUMI has performed better with a 7.75% return vs 5.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NCLO or NUMI?

NCLO is cheaper with a 0.26% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for NUMI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NCLO or NUMI?

NCLO has the higher dividend yield at 5.78%, compared with 3.66% for NUMI.

What is the main difference between NCLO and NUMI?

NCLO is categorized as CLO, while NUMI is Municipal Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.26% for NCLO and 0.29% for NUMI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NUMI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.