PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NUMI vs. NUMG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NUMI vs. NUMG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Municipal Income ETF (NUMI) and Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF (NUMG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NUMI achieves a 1.69% return, which is significantly higher than NUMG's -5.28% return.


NUMI

1D
0.10%
1M
1.11%
YTD
1.69%
6M
1.63%
1Y
7.01%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NUMG

1D
0.98%
1M
-1.63%
YTD
-5.28%
6M
-7.05%
1Y
-5.13%
3Y*
6.52%
5Y*
-1.07%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NUMI vs. NUMG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
NUMI
Nuveen Municipal Income ETF
1.69%3.78%
NUMG
Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF
-5.28%-3.73%

Correlation

The correlation between NUMI and NUMG is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 23, 2025

0.18

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NUMI vs. NUMG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NUMI
NUMI Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
NUMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NUMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
NUMI Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
NUMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
NUMI Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

NUMG
NUMG Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
NUMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NUMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
NUMG Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
NUMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
NUMG Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NUMI vs. NUMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Municipal Income ETF (NUMI) and Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF (NUMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NUMINUMGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

0.97

+0.48

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.50

-0.26

+2.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.69

-0.66

+8.35

NUMI vs. NUMG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NUMI Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is higher than the NUMG Sharpe Ratio of -0.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NUMI and NUMG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NUMI vs. NUMG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NUMI drawdown since its inception was -4.72%, smaller than the maximum NUMG drawdown of -38.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUMI and NUMG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NUMINUMGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.72%

-38.85%

+34.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.82%

-19.71%

+16.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.47%

-13.78%

+13.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.36%

-11.37%

+10.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.91%

7.80%

-6.89%

Volatility

NUMI vs. NUMG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nuveen Municipal Income ETF (NUMI) is 0.60%, while Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF (NUMG) has a volatility of 6.35%. This indicates that NUMI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NUMG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NUMINUMGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.60%

6.35%

-5.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.20%

15.09%

-12.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.41%

18.65%

-15.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.31%

22.94%

-18.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.31%

21.86%

-17.55%

NUMI vs. NUMG - Expense Ratio Comparison

NUMI has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than NUMG's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

NUMI vs. NUMG - Dividend Comparison

NUMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.65%, more than NUMG's 0.01% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
NUMG
Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF
0.01%0.01%0.06%0.18%0.18%12.76%3.82%0.27%5.14%0.56%
NUMI
Nuveen Municipal Income ETF
3.65%3.44%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


NUMI and NUMG have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NUMG has higher volatility (6.35%) compared to NUMI (0.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NUMI dropped -4.72% vs NUMG's -38.85%.

On 1-year performance, NUMI leads with 7.01% vs -5.13% for NUMG. On fees, NUMI is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, NUMI has been the lower-risk option at 0.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, NUMI has performed better with a 7.01% return vs -5.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NUMI is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for NUMG.

NUMI has the higher dividend yield at 3.65%, compared with 0.01% for NUMG.

NUMI is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while NUMG is Mid Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for NUMI and 0.30% for NUMG.

NUMI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs -0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NUMI and NUMG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer