PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NUMI vs. MFLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NUMI vs. MFLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Municipal Income ETF (NUMI) and First Trust Flexible Municipal High Income ETF (MFLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NUMI achieves a 1.53% return, which is significantly lower than MFLX's 3.33% return.


NUMI

1D
0.06%
1M
0.54%
YTD
1.53%
6M
1.91%
1Y
7.75%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MFLX

1D
-0.06%
1M
1.21%
YTD
3.33%
6M
3.84%
1Y
9.22%
3Y*
5.48%
5Y*
-0.03%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NUMI vs. MFLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between NUMI and MFLX is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 24, 2025

0.53

The correlation between NUMI and MFLX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NUMI vs. MFLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NUMI
NUMI Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
NUMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NUMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
NUMI Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
NUMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
NUMI Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

MFLX
MFLX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
MFLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MFLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
MFLX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
MFLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
MFLX Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NUMI vs. MFLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Municipal Income ETF (NUMI) and First Trust Flexible Municipal High Income ETF (MFLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NUMIMFLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.49

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.76

2.97

-0.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.62

11.95

-3.33

NUMI vs. MFLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NUMI Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is comparable to the MFLX Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NUMI and MFLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NUMIMFLXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.24

2.27

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.91

0.19

+0.72

Drawdowns

NUMI vs. MFLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NUMI drawdown since its inception was -4.72%, smaller than the maximum MFLX drawdown of -26.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUMI and MFLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NUMIMFLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.72%

-26.76%

+22.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.82%

-3.11%

+0.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.63%

-3.78%

+3.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.39%

-8.17%

+6.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.90%

0.77%

+0.13%

Volatility

NUMI vs. MFLX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nuveen Municipal Income ETF (NUMI) is 1.05%, while First Trust Flexible Municipal High Income ETF (MFLX) has a volatility of 1.41%. This indicates that NUMI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MFLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NUMIMFLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.05%

1.41%

-0.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.23%

2.98%

-0.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.48%

4.08%

-0.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.39%

10.36%

-5.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.39%

11.29%

-6.90%

NUMI vs. MFLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NUMI has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than MFLX's 0.88% expense ratio.


Dividends

NUMI vs. MFLX - Dividend Comparison

NUMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.66%, less than MFLX's 4.08% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
MFLX
First Trust Flexible Municipal High Income ETF
4.08%4.06%3.81%3.65%4.27%3.69%3.21%2.94%3.74%3.80%0.98%
NUMI
Nuveen Municipal Income ETF
3.66%3.44%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


NUMI and MFLX have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MFLX has higher volatility (1.41%) compared to NUMI (1.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NUMI dropped -4.72% vs MFLX's -26.76%.

On 1-year performance, MFLX leads with 9.22% vs 7.75% for NUMI. On fees, NUMI is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, NUMI has been the lower-risk option at 1.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MFLX has performed better with a 9.22% return vs 7.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NUMI is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for MFLX.

MFLX has the higher dividend yield at 4.08%, compared with 3.66% for NUMI.

They also come from different issuers: Nuveen and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for NUMI and 0.88% for MFLX.

MFLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NUMI and MFLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer