NCLH vs. SLX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

NCLH (Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd.) is a stock, while SLX (VanEck Vectors Steel ETF) is Materials fund tracking the NYSE Arca Steel Index. Over the past 10 years, NCLH returned -8.83%/yr vs 19.73%/yr for SLX. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

NCLH vs. SLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. (NCLH) and VanEck Vectors Steel ETF (SLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NCLH achieves a -18.68% return, which is significantly lower than SLX's 32.29% return. Over the past 10 years, NCLH has underperformed SLX with an annualized return of -8.83%, while SLX has yielded a comparatively higher 19.73% annualized return.

NCLH

• 1D: 0.11%
• 1M: 5.52%
• YTD: -18.68%
• 6M: -3.61%
• 1Y: -0.71%
• 3Y*: 4.77%
• 5Y*: -10.79%
• 10Y*: -8.83%

SLX

• 1D: -1.15%
• 1M: 9.68%
• YTD: 32.29%
• 6M: 36.55%
• 1Y: 77.34%
• 3Y*: 26.67%
• 5Y*: 16.14%
• 10Y*: 19.73%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NCLH vs. SLX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
NCLH Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd.	-18.68%	-13.25%	28.39%	63.73%	-40.98%	-18.44%	-56.46%	37.79%	-20.39%	25.21%
SLX VanEck Vectors Steel ETF	32.29%	47.45%	-17.94%	31.25%	14.28%	27.69%	20.57%	12.01%	-19.27%	24.59%

Correlation

The correlation between NCLH and SLX is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.42
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.37
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.42
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.42
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2013	0.38

Return for Risk

NCLH vs. SLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NCLH

NCLH Risk / Return Rank: 39
NCLH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
NCLH Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
NCLH Omega Ratio Rank: 37
NCLH Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
NCLH Martin Ratio Rank: 39

SLX

SLX Risk / Return Rank: 86
SLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
SLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
SLX Omega Ratio Rank: 84
SLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
SLX Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NCLH vs. SLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. (NCLH) and VanEck Vectors Steel ETF (SLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NCLH	SLX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.01	3.25	-3.27
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.37	4.05	-3.68
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.04	1.52	-0.47
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.02	4.76	-4.77
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.03	16.63	-16.66
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NCLH vs. SLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NCLH Sharpe Ratio is -0.01, which is lower than the SLX Sharpe Ratio of 3.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NCLH and SLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NCLH	SLX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.01	3.25	-3.27
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.19	0.59	-0.77
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.14	0.64	-0.78
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.04	0.22	-0.26

Drawdowns

NCLH vs. SLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NCLH drawdown since its inception was -87.81%, which is greater than SLX's maximum drawdown of -82.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NCLH and SLX.

Drawdown Indicators

	NCLH	SLX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-87.81%	-82.14%	-5.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-45.10%	-16.35%	-28.75%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-49.12%	-27.39%	-21.73%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-69.21%	-33.62%	-35.59%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-87.25%	-61.64%	-25.61%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-71.53%	-1.15%	-70.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-39.93%	-38.73%	-1.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	20.84%	4.67%	+16.17%

Volatility

NCLH vs. SLX - Volatility Comparison

Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. (NCLH) has a higher volatility of 14.82% compared to VanEck Vectors Steel ETF (SLX) at 7.87%. This indicates that NCLH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NCLH	SLX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.82%	7.87%	+6.95%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	42.25%	17.92%	+24.33%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	52.87%	23.92%	+28.95%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	57.59%	27.72%	+29.87%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	61.96%	31.02%	+30.94%

Dividends

NCLH vs. SLX - Dividend Comparison

NCLH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.17%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NCLH Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SLX VanEck Vectors Steel ETF	1.17%	1.55%	3.56%	2.80%	4.97%	7.07%	1.87%	3.44%	6.26%	2.50%	1.06%	5.35%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NCLH and SLX in my portfolio?

NCLH and SLX have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NCLH or SLX?

NCLH has higher volatility (14.82%) compared to SLX (7.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NCLH dropped -87.81% vs SLX's -82.14%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.25 vs -0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.