NCLH vs. UAL

In the year-to-date period, NCLH achieves a 34.03% return, which is significantly lower than UAL's 130.83% return. Over the past 10 years, NCLH has underperformed UAL with an annualized return of -4.42%, while UAL has yielded a comparatively higher 5.42% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. (NCLH) and United Airlines Holdings, Inc. (UAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current NCLH Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is lower than the UAL Sharpe Ratio of 3.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NCLH and UAL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Neither NCLH nor UAL has paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum NCLH drawdown since its inception was -87.81%, smaller than the maximum UAL drawdown of -93.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NCLH and UAL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. (NCLH) is 11.70%, while United Airlines Holdings, Inc. (UAL) has a volatility of 12.98%. This indicates that NCLH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UAL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. and United Airlines Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.