PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NCIQ vs. CEF.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NCIQ vs. CEF.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hashdex Nasdaq Crypto Index US ETF (NCIQ) and Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust (CEF.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

NCIQ is traded in USD, while CEF.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the CEF.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NCIQ achieves a -28.25% return, which is significantly lower than CEF.TO's 3.07% return.


NCIQ

1D
-2.92%
1M
-18.28%
YTD
-28.25%
6M
-33.10%
1Y
-40.00%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CEF.TO

1D
0.00%
1M
0.95%
YTD
3.07%
6M
12.24%
1Y
57.75%
3Y*
36.41%
5Y*
18.75%
10Y*
14.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NCIQ vs. CEF.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
NCIQ
Hashdex Nasdaq Crypto Index US ETF
-28.25%-10.21%
CEF.TO
Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust
1.26%72.54%

Correlation

The correlation between NCIQ and CEF.TO is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 18, 2025

0.15

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NCIQ vs. CEF.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NCIQ
NCIQ Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
NCIQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NCIQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
NCIQ Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
NCIQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
NCIQ Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

CEF.TO
CEF.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
CEF.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CEF.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
CEF.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
CEF.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
CEF.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NCIQ vs. CEF.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hashdex Nasdaq Crypto Index US ETF (NCIQ) and Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust (CEF.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NCIQCEF.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.87

1.30

-0.43

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.76

2.14

-2.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.29

5.46

-6.75

NCIQ vs. CEF.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NCIQ Sharpe Ratio is -0.85, which is lower than the CEF.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NCIQ and CEF.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NCIQCEF.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.85

1.54

-2.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.61

0.36

-0.96

Drawdowns

NCIQ vs. CEF.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NCIQ drawdown since its inception was -52.90%, smaller than the maximum CEF.TO drawdown of -62.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NCIQ and CEF.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NCIQCEF.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.90%

-62.33%

+9.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-52.90%

-27.11%

-25.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-52.01%

-20.69%

-31.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.86%

-31.26%

+9.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

30.94%

10.61%

+20.33%

Volatility

NCIQ vs. CEF.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hashdex Nasdaq Crypto Index US ETF (NCIQ) is 9.56%, while Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust (CEF.TO) has a volatility of 10.31%. This indicates that NCIQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CEF.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NCIQCEF.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.56%

10.31%

-0.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

36.46%

35.20%

+1.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

47.21%

37.80%

+9.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

47.80%

24.44%

+23.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

47.80%

22.54%

+25.26%

Dividends

NCIQ vs. CEF.TO - Dividend Comparison

Neither NCIQ nor CEF.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CEF.TO
Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.08%0.09%0.09%
NCIQ
Hashdex Nasdaq Crypto Index US ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


NCIQ and CEF.TO have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NCIQ and CEF.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer