CEF.TO vs. PHYS
Compare and contrast key facts about Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust (CEF.TO) and Sprott Physical Gold Trust (PHYS).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CEF.TO or PHYS.
Correlation
The correlation between CEF.TO and PHYS is 0.02, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
CEF.TO vs. PHYS - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
CEF.TO:
1.47
PHYS:
1.84
CEF.TO:
2.08
PHYS:
2.35
CEF.TO:
1.26
PHYS:
1.31
CEF.TO:
3.29
PHYS:
3.46
CEF.TO:
8.04
PHYS:
9.30
CEF.TO:
3.90%
PHYS:
3.43%
CEF.TO:
20.73%
PHYS:
17.76%
CEF.TO:
-58.68%
PHYS:
-48.16%
CEF.TO:
-5.56%
PHYS:
-7.71%
Fundamentals
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CEF.TO achieves a 14.77% return, which is significantly lower than PHYS's 20.06% return. Over the past 10 years, CEF.TO has outperformed PHYS with an annualized return of 10.20%, while PHYS has yielded a comparatively lower 9.12% annualized return.
CEF.TO
14.77%
-0.96%
17.59%
30.32%
11.56%
10.20%
PHYS
20.06%
-2.07%
22.31%
32.42%
11.63%
9.12%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CEF.TO vs. PHYS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
CEF.TO
PHYS
CEF.TO vs. PHYS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust (CEF.TO) and Sprott Physical Gold Trust (PHYS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Dividends
CEF.TO vs. PHYS - Dividend Comparison
Neither CEF.TO nor PHYS has paid dividends to shareholders.
TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEF.TO Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.08% | 0.09% | 0.09% | 0.08% |
PHYS Sprott Physical Gold Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
CEF.TO vs. PHYS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CEF.TO drawdown since its inception was -58.68%, which is greater than PHYS's maximum drawdown of -48.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEF.TO and PHYS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Loading data...
Volatility
CEF.TO vs. PHYS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust (CEF.TO) is 6.96%, while Sprott Physical Gold Trust (PHYS) has a volatility of 9.13%. This indicates that CEF.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PHYS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading data...
Financials
CEF.TO vs. PHYS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust and Sprott Physical Gold Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities