PortfoliosLab logo
CEF.TO vs. PHYS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between CEF.TO and PHYS is 0.02, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

CEF.TO vs. PHYS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust (CEF.TO) and Sprott Physical Gold Trust (PHYS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CEF.TO:

1.47

PHYS:

1.84

Sortino Ratio

CEF.TO:

2.08

PHYS:

2.35

Omega Ratio

CEF.TO:

1.26

PHYS:

1.31

Calmar Ratio

CEF.TO:

3.29

PHYS:

3.46

Martin Ratio

CEF.TO:

8.04

PHYS:

9.30

Ulcer Index

CEF.TO:

3.90%

PHYS:

3.43%

Daily Std Dev

CEF.TO:

20.73%

PHYS:

17.76%

Max Drawdown

CEF.TO:

-58.68%

PHYS:

-48.16%

Current Drawdown

CEF.TO:

-5.56%

PHYS:

-7.71%

Fundamentals

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CEF.TO achieves a 14.77% return, which is significantly lower than PHYS's 20.06% return. Over the past 10 years, CEF.TO has outperformed PHYS with an annualized return of 10.20%, while PHYS has yielded a comparatively lower 9.12% annualized return.


CEF.TO

YTD

14.77%

1M

-0.96%

6M

17.59%

1Y

30.32%

5Y*

11.56%

10Y*

10.20%

PHYS

YTD

20.06%

1M

-2.07%

6M

22.31%

1Y

32.42%

5Y*

11.63%

10Y*

9.12%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CEF.TO vs. PHYS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CEF.TO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CEF.TO is 9090
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CEF.TO is 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CEF.TO is 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CEF.TO is 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CEF.TO is 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CEF.TO is 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

PHYS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PHYS is 9393
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PHYS is 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PHYS is 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PHYS is 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PHYS is 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PHYS is 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CEF.TO vs. PHYS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust (CEF.TO) and Sprott Physical Gold Trust (PHYS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current CEF.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is comparable to the PHYS Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CEF.TO and PHYS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

CEF.TO vs. PHYS - Dividend Comparison

Neither CEF.TO nor PHYS has paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
CEF.TO
Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.08%0.09%0.09%0.08%
PHYS
Sprott Physical Gold Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

CEF.TO vs. PHYS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CEF.TO drawdown since its inception was -58.68%, which is greater than PHYS's maximum drawdown of -48.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEF.TO and PHYS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

CEF.TO vs. PHYS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust (CEF.TO) is 6.96%, while Sprott Physical Gold Trust (PHYS) has a volatility of 9.13%. This indicates that CEF.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PHYS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

CEF.TO vs. PHYS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust and Sprott Physical Gold Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


-400.00M-200.00M0.00200.00M400.00M600.00MAprilJulyOctober2021AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober
-140.51M
(CEF.TO) Total Revenue
(PHYS) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. CEF.TO values in CAD, PHYS values in USD