CEF.TO vs. PHYS

In the year-to-date period, CEF.TO achieves a 35.47% return, which is significantly higher than PHYS's 26.05% return. Over the past 10 years, CEF.TO has outperformed PHYS with an annualized return of 10.11%, while PHYS has yielded a comparatively lower 7.36% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust (CEF.TO) and Sprott Physical Gold Trust (PHYS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current CEF.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.63, which is lower than the PHYS Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CEF.TO and PHYS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Neither CEF.TO nor PHYS has paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum CEF.TO drawdown since its inception was -62.22%, which is greater than PHYS's maximum drawdown of -48.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEF.TO and PHYS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust (CEF.TO) has a higher volatility of 6.12% compared to Sprott Physical Gold Trust (PHYS) at 5.22%. This indicates that CEF.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PHYS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust and Sprott Physical Gold Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.