NCHRX vs. NVLIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Nuveen California High Yield Municipal Bond Fund (NCHRX) and Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG Fund Class I (NVLIX).
NCHRX is managed by Nuveen. It was launched on Mar 27, 2006. NVLIX is managed by Nuveen. It was launched on May 15, 2009.
Performance
NCHRX vs. NVLIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
NCHRX vs. NVLIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NCHRX Nuveen California High Yield Municipal Bond Fund | -1.03% | 3.34% | 5.17% | 4.46% | -20.76% | 5.41% | 6.02% | 12.21% | -0.33% | 11.27% |
NVLIX Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG Fund Class I | -14.74% | 12.76% | 29.48% | 43.60% | -31.31% | 27.62% | 37.97% | 33.54% | 3.02% | 33.09% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NCHRX achieves a -1.03% return, which is significantly higher than NVLIX's -14.74% return. Over the past 10 years, NCHRX has underperformed NVLIX with an annualized return of 1.85%, while NVLIX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.06% annualized return.
NCHRX
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- -3.39%
- YTD
- -1.03%
- 6M
- 1.27%
- 1Y
- 2.79%
- 3Y*
- 2.93%
- 5Y*
- -1.34%
- 10Y*
- 1.85%
NVLIX
- 1D
- -0.77%
- 1M
- -9.92%
- YTD
- -14.74%
- 6M
- -14.11%
- 1Y
- 6.84%
- 3Y*
- 16.78%
- 5Y*
- 9.29%
- 10Y*
- 15.06%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NCHRX vs. NVLIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NCHRX has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is lower than NVLIX's 0.83% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
NCHRX vs. NVLIX — Risk / Return Rank
NCHRX
NVLIX
NCHRX vs. NVLIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen California High Yield Municipal Bond Fund (NCHRX) and Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG Fund Class I (NVLIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NCHRX | NVLIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.45 | 0.29 | +0.16 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.63 | 0.58 | +0.04 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.08 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.41 | 0.15 | +0.26 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.03 | 0.49 | +0.54 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NCHRX | NVLIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 | 0.29 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.19 | 0.42 | -0.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 | 0.69 | -0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.73 | -0.19 |
Correlation
The correlation between NCHRX and NVLIX is -0.01. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
NCHRX vs. NVLIX - Dividend Comparison
NCHRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.29%, less than NVLIX's 26.33% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NCHRX Nuveen California High Yield Municipal Bond Fund | 4.29% | 4.59% | 4.28% | 4.40% | 5.14% | 3.90% | 3.85% | 4.17% | 4.08% | 3.94% | 4.42% | 4.45% |
NVLIX Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG Fund Class I | 26.33% | 22.45% | 14.35% | 5.39% | 8.93% | 9.51% | 5.47% | 8.69% | 18.81% | 18.70% | 17.11% | 15.18% |
Drawdowns
NCHRX vs. NVLIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NCHRX drawdown since its inception was -39.64%, roughly equal to the maximum NVLIX drawdown of -39.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NCHRX and NVLIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| NCHRX | NVLIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.64% | -39.57% | -0.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.05% | -19.01% | +10.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.27% | -39.57% | +11.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.27% | -39.57% | +11.30% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.04% | -19.01% | +7.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.07% | -6.20% | -0.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.21% | 5.81% | -2.60% |
Volatility
NCHRX vs. NVLIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Nuveen California High Yield Municipal Bond Fund (NCHRX) is 1.60%, while Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG Fund Class I (NVLIX) has a volatility of 5.48%. This indicates that NCHRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVLIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| NCHRX | NVLIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.60% | 5.48% | -3.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.47% | 12.08% | -9.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.74% | 22.64% | -14.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.96% | 22.35% | -15.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.46% | 21.97% | -14.51% |