PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NCHRX vs. FNMIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NCHRX vs. FNMIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen California High Yield Municipal Bond Fund (NCHRX) and Fidelity New Markets Income Fund (FNMIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NCHRX achieves a 0.38% return, which is significantly lower than FNMIX's 2.66% return. Over the past 10 years, NCHRX has underperformed FNMIX with an annualized return of 1.55%, while FNMIX has yielded a comparatively higher 3.39% annualized return.


NCHRX

1D
-0.52%
1M
-2.89%
6M
-0.01%
YTD
0.38%
1Y
7.41%
3Y*
3.95%
5Y*
-2.03%
10Y*
1.55%
ALL TIME*
3.65%

FNMIX

1D
-0.22%
1M
-1.50%
6M
1.15%
YTD
2.66%
1Y
10.22%
3Y*
10.65%
5Y*
3.44%
10Y*
3.39%
ALL TIME*
8.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

NCHRX vs. FNMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NCHRX
Nuveen California High Yield Municipal Bond Fund
0.38%3.34%5.17%4.46%-20.76%5.41%6.02%12.21%-0.33%11.27%
FNMIX
Fidelity New Markets Income Fund
2.66%14.86%6.80%14.00%-16.09%-2.42%4.62%10.93%-7.77%10.16%

Correlation

The correlation between NCHRX and FNMIX is 0.61, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.55

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 17, 2006

0.26

Over the past year, NCHRX and FNMIX have become more correlated (0.61) than their long-term average of 0.26, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NCHRX vs. FNMIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NCHRX
NCHRX Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
NCHRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NCHRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
NCHRX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
NCHRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
NCHRX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

FNMIX
FNMIX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
FNMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
FNMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NCHRX vs. FNMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen California High Yield Municipal Bond Fund (NCHRX) and Fidelity New Markets Income Fund (FNMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NCHRXFNMIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.49

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.42

2.81

-0.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.77

11.63

-3.85

NCHRX vs. FNMIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NCHRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.11, which is comparable to the FNMIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NCHRX and FNMIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NCHRX vs. FNMIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NCHRX drawdown since its inception was -39.64%, smaller than the maximum FNMIX drawdown of -42.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NCHRX and FNMIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NCHRXFNMIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.64%

-42.76%

+3.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.64%

-3.85%

+0.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.90%

-5.87%

-4.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.27%

-27.16%

-1.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.27%

-27.16%

-1.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.77%

-1.81%

-7.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.10%

-5.67%

-1.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.13%

0.93%

+0.20%

Volatility

NCHRX vs. FNMIX - Volatility Comparison

Nuveen California High Yield Municipal Bond Fund (NCHRX) has a higher volatility of 1.33% compared to Fidelity New Markets Income Fund (FNMIX) at 0.89%. This indicates that NCHRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNMIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NCHRXFNMIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.33%

0.89%

+0.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.28%

3.60%

-0.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.18%

4.46%

-0.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.03%

6.64%

+0.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.49%

6.88%

+0.61%

NCHRX vs. FNMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NCHRX has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is lower than FNMIX's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

NCHRX vs. FNMIX - Dividend Comparison

NCHRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.90%, less than FNMIX's 4.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FNMIX
Fidelity New Markets Income Fund
4.58%5.07%4.71%5.15%3.93%3.48%4.06%4.87%4.98%5.77%6.93%4.95%
NCHRX
Nuveen California High Yield Municipal Bond Fund
3.90%4.59%4.28%4.40%5.14%3.90%3.85%4.17%4.08%3.94%4.42%4.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


NCHRX and FNMIX have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NCHRX has higher volatility (1.33%) compared to FNMIX (0.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NCHRX dropped -39.64% vs FNMIX's -42.76%.

FNMIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NCHRX and FNMIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer