PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NCHRX vs. MUJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NCHRX vs. MUJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen California High Yield Municipal Bond Fund (NCHRX) and BlackRock MuniHoldings New Jersey Quality Fund (MUJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NCHRX achieves a 2.32% return, which is significantly lower than MUJ's 5.45% return. Over the past 10 years, NCHRX has underperformed MUJ with an annualized return of 1.78%, while MUJ has yielded a comparatively higher 2.42% annualized return.


NCHRX

1D
-0.13%
1M
2.47%
YTD
2.32%
6M
2.98%
1Y
9.50%
3Y*
4.30%
5Y*
-1.35%
10Y*
1.78%

MUJ

1D
-0.08%
1M
1.10%
YTD
5.45%
6M
4.65%
1Y
18.47%
3Y*
9.07%
5Y*
0.03%
10Y*
2.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NCHRX vs. MUJ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NCHRX
Nuveen California High Yield Municipal Bond Fund
2.32%3.34%5.17%4.46%-20.76%5.41%6.02%12.21%-0.33%11.27%
MUJ
BlackRock MuniHoldings New Jersey Quality Fund
5.45%13.86%2.28%7.55%-26.31%15.20%5.95%18.95%-8.49%9.99%

Correlation

The correlation between NCHRX and MUJ is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 17, 2006

0.29

The correlation between NCHRX and MUJ shifts across timeframes, from 0.29 (all time) to 0.46 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NCHRX vs. MUJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NCHRX
NCHRX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
NCHRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NCHRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
NCHRX Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
NCHRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
NCHRX Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

MUJ
MUJ Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
MUJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MUJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
MUJ Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
MUJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
MUJ Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NCHRX vs. MUJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen California High Yield Municipal Bond Fund (NCHRX) and BlackRock MuniHoldings New Jersey Quality Fund (MUJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NCHRXMUJDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

1.40

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.67

1.97

+0.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.71

7.91

+0.80

NCHRX vs. MUJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NCHRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.34, which is comparable to the MUJ Sharpe Ratio of 2.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NCHRX and MUJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NCHRX vs. MUJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NCHRX drawdown since its inception was -39.64%, roughly equal to the maximum MUJ drawdown of -41.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NCHRX and MUJ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NCHRXMUJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.64%

-41.72%

+2.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.64%

-9.41%

+5.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.63%

-12.17%

+0.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.27%

-32.71%

+4.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.27%

-32.71%

+4.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.02%

-2.72%

-5.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.09%

-9.03%

+1.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.11%

2.34%

-1.23%

Volatility

NCHRX vs. MUJ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nuveen California High Yield Municipal Bond Fund (NCHRX) is 1.11%, while BlackRock MuniHoldings New Jersey Quality Fund (MUJ) has a volatility of 2.23%. This indicates that NCHRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MUJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NCHRXMUJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.11%

2.23%

-1.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.01%

6.92%

-3.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.17%

8.97%

-4.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.01%

10.37%

-3.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.48%

11.20%

-3.72%

NCHRX vs. MUJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

NCHRX has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is lower than MUJ's 2.26% expense ratio.


Dividends

NCHRX vs. MUJ - Dividend Comparison

NCHRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.18%, less than MUJ's 5.30% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MUJ
BlackRock MuniHoldings New Jersey Quality Fund
5.30%5.45%5.53%4.13%6.40%4.77%4.78%4.03%5.34%5.55%6.00%5.69%
NCHRX
Nuveen California High Yield Municipal Bond Fund
4.18%4.59%4.28%4.40%5.14%3.90%3.85%4.17%4.08%3.94%4.42%4.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


NCHRX and MUJ have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MUJ has higher volatility (2.23%) compared to NCHRX (1.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NCHRX dropped -39.64% vs MUJ's -41.72%.

NCHRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 2.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NCHRX and MUJ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer