NCGFX vs. MUHLX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

NCGFX (New Covenant Growth Fund) and MUHLX (Muhlenkamp Fund) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, NCGFX returned 13.86%/yr vs 10.82%/yr for MUHLX. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. NCGFX charges 0.97%/yr vs 1.14%/yr for MUHLX.

Performance

NCGFX vs. MUHLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in New Covenant Growth Fund (NCGFX) and Muhlenkamp Fund (MUHLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with NCGFX having a 10.10% return and MUHLX slightly lower at 9.89%. Over the past 10 years, NCGFX has outperformed MUHLX with an annualized return of 13.86%, while MUHLX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.82% annualized return.

NCGFX

• 1D: 1.14%
• 1M: 0.81%
• YTD: 10.10%
• 6M: 9.28%
• 1Y: 26.47%
• 3Y*: 19.29%
• 5Y*: 11.18%
• 10Y*: 13.86%

MUHLX

• 1D: -0.16%
• 1M: -0.85%
• YTD: 9.89%
• 6M: 7.71%
• 1Y: 20.60%
• 3Y*: 12.67%
• 5Y*: 11.48%
• 10Y*: 10.82%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NCGFX vs. MUHLX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
NCGFX New Covenant Growth Fund	10.10%	15.84%	22.15%	25.24%	-19.62%	20.69%	20.25%	30.23%	-6.07%	21.60%
MUHLX Muhlenkamp Fund	9.89%	17.82%	3.38%	13.92%	2.89%	28.98%	11.96%	14.39%	-13.29%	18.78%

Correlation

The correlation between NCGFX and MUHLX is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.66
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.72
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.75
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.80
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 1999	0.87

Over the past year, the correlation between NCGFX and MUHLX has dropped to 0.66 - well below their long-term average of 0.87, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

NCGFX vs. MUHLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NCGFX

NCGFX Risk / Return Rank: 58
NCGFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
NCGFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
NCGFX Omega Ratio Rank: 52
NCGFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
NCGFX Martin Ratio Rank: 69

MUHLX

MUHLX Risk / Return Rank: 29
MUHLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
MUHLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
MUHLX Omega Ratio Rank: 26
MUHLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
MUHLX Martin Ratio Rank: 33

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NCGFX vs. MUHLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for New Covenant Growth Fund (NCGFX) and Muhlenkamp Fund (MUHLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NCGFX	MUHLX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.04	1.43	+0.61
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.78	1.97	+0.81
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.25	+0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.82	2.01	+0.81
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.39	7.08	+5.31

NCGFX vs. MUHLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NCGFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.04, which is higher than the MUHLX Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NCGFX and MUHLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NCGFX vs. MUHLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NCGFX drawdown since its inception was -55.18%, smaller than the maximum MUHLX drawdown of -62.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NCGFX and MUHLX.

Drawdown Indicators

	NCGFX	MUHLX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.18%	-62.05%	+6.87%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.31%	-10.23%	+0.92%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.32%	-18.63%	-6.69%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.10%	-18.63%	-9.47%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.28%	-40.85%	+6.57%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.14%	-4.97%	+3.83%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.45%	-10.76%	-0.69%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.12%	2.91%	-0.79%

Volatility

NCGFX vs. MUHLX - Volatility Comparison

New Covenant Growth Fund (NCGFX) has a higher volatility of 4.84% compared to Muhlenkamp Fund (MUHLX) at 4.32%. This indicates that NCGFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MUHLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NCGFX	MUHLX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.84%	4.32%	+0.52%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.21%	11.25%	-1.04%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.89%	14.45%	-1.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.60%	14.64%	+3.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.01%	17.07%	+1.94%

NCGFX vs. MUHLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NCGFX has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is lower than MUHLX's 1.14% expense ratio.

Dividends

NCGFX vs. MUHLX - Dividend Comparison

NCGFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.78%, more than MUHLX's 3.04% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MUHLX Muhlenkamp Fund	3.04%	3.34%	0.58%	0.89%	6.80%	7.77%	10.28%	1.26%	14.70%	4.30%	0.00%	11.02%
NCGFX New Covenant Growth Fund	8.78%	9.67%	10.12%	6.81%	1.61%	1.45%	4.07%	5.55%	8.44%	6.54%	0.66%	7.83%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NCGFX and MUHLX in my portfolio?

NCGFX and MUHLX have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NCGFX or MUHLX?

NCGFX has higher volatility (4.84%) compared to MUHLX (4.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NCGFX dropped -55.18% vs MUHLX's -62.05%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NCGFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.