PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NCGFX vs. FEQHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NCGFX vs. FEQHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in New Covenant Growth Fund (NCGFX) and Fidelity Hedged Equity Fund (FEQHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NCGFX achieves a 10.10% return, which is significantly higher than FEQHX's 8.26% return.


NCGFX

1D
1.14%
1M
0.81%
YTD
10.10%
6M
9.28%
1Y
26.47%
3Y*
19.29%
5Y*
11.18%
10Y*
13.86%

FEQHX

1D
0.88%
1M
0.00%
YTD
8.26%
6M
7.75%
1Y
20.17%
3Y*
16.28%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NCGFX vs. FEQHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
NCGFX
New Covenant Growth Fund
10.10%15.84%22.15%25.24%-3.15%
FEQHX
Fidelity Hedged Equity Fund
8.26%13.61%19.46%17.65%-4.85%

Correlation

The correlation between NCGFX and FEQHX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 8, 2022

0.95

The correlation between NCGFX and FEQHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NCGFX vs. FEQHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NCGFX
NCGFX Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
NCGFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NCGFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
NCGFX Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
NCGFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
NCGFX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

FEQHX
FEQHX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
FEQHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEQHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEQHX Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
FEQHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEQHX Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NCGFX vs. FEQHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for New Covenant Growth Fund (NCGFX) and Fidelity Hedged Equity Fund (FEQHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NCGFXFEQHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.37

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.82

2.70

+0.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.39

10.42

+1.97

NCGFX vs. FEQHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NCGFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.04, which is comparable to the FEQHX Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NCGFX and FEQHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NCGFX vs. FEQHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NCGFX drawdown since its inception was -55.18%, which is greater than FEQHX's maximum drawdown of -10.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NCGFX and FEQHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NCGFXFEQHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.18%

-10.42%

-44.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.31%

-7.40%

-1.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.32%

-10.42%

-14.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.14%

-1.59%

+0.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.45%

-2.22%

-9.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.12%

1.91%

+0.21%

Volatility

NCGFX vs. FEQHX - Volatility Comparison

New Covenant Growth Fund (NCGFX) has a higher volatility of 4.84% compared to Fidelity Hedged Equity Fund (FEQHX) at 4.05%. This indicates that NCGFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FEQHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NCGFXFEQHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.84%

4.05%

+0.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.21%

7.50%

+2.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.89%

9.73%

+3.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.60%

11.33%

+7.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.01%

11.33%

+7.68%

NCGFX vs. FEQHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NCGFX has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than FEQHX's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

NCGFX vs. FEQHX - Dividend Comparison

NCGFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.78%, more than FEQHX's 0.51% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FEQHX
Fidelity Hedged Equity Fund
0.51%0.43%0.61%0.77%0.37%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NCGFX
New Covenant Growth Fund
8.78%9.67%10.12%6.81%1.61%1.45%4.07%5.55%8.44%6.54%0.66%7.83%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, NCGFX and FEQHX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

NCGFX has higher volatility (4.84%) compared to FEQHX (4.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NCGFX dropped -55.18% vs FEQHX's -10.42%.

FEQHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 2.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NCGFX and FEQHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer