NCBGX vs. QBDSX

Last updated Jul 3, 2026

NCBGX (New Covenant Balanced Growth Fund) and QBDSX (Quantified Managed Income Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 10 years, NCBGX returned 8.92%/yr vs 0.52%/yr for QBDSX. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NCBGX charges 0.13%/yr vs 1.31%/yr for QBDSX.

Performance

NCBGX vs. QBDSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in New Covenant Balanced Growth Fund (NCBGX) and Quantified Managed Income Fund (QBDSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NCBGX achieves a 6.25% return, which is significantly higher than QBDSX's -0.76% return. Over the past 10 years, NCBGX has outperformed QBDSX with an annualized return of 8.92%, while QBDSX has yielded a comparatively lower 0.52% annualized return.

NCBGX

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: -0.58%
• 6M: 6.25%
• YTD: 6.25%
• 1Y: 13.96%
• 3Y*: 13.02%
• 5Y*: 6.86%
• 10Y*: 8.92%

QBDSX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -1.01%
• 6M: -0.76%
• YTD: -0.76%
• 1Y: -0.24%
• 3Y*: 2.52%
• 5Y*: 0.53%
• 10Y*: 0.52%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NCBGX vs. QBDSX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
NCBGX New Covenant Balanced Growth Fund	6.25%	12.56%	13.80%	16.76%	-15.81%	13.68%	15.42%	20.38%	-3.42%	13.47%
QBDSX Quantified Managed Income Fund	-0.76%	5.11%	1.02%	2.25%	-4.09%	-0.66%	-9.22%	10.50%	-3.17%	5.05%

Correlation

The correlation between NCBGX and QBDSX is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.63
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.51
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.41
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.49
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2014	0.42

Over the past year, NCBGX and QBDSX have become more correlated (0.63) than their long-term average of 0.42, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

NCBGX vs. QBDSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NCBGX

NCBGX Risk / Return Rank: 61
NCBGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
NCBGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
NCBGX Omega Ratio Rank: 56
NCBGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
NCBGX Martin Ratio Rank: 72

QBDSX

QBDSX Risk / Return Rank: 3
QBDSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
QBDSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
QBDSX Omega Ratio Rank: 3
QBDSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
QBDSX Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NCBGX vs. QBDSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for New Covenant Balanced Growth Fund (NCBGX) and Quantified Managed Income Fund (QBDSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NCBGX	QBDSX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.74	-0.03	+1.78
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.48	-0.02	+2.50
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.00	+0.32
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.47	-0.04	+2.51
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.80	-0.09	+10.89

NCBGX vs. QBDSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NCBGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is higher than the QBDSX Sharpe Ratio of -0.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NCBGX and QBDSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NCBGX vs. QBDSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NCBGX drawdown since its inception was -41.27%, which is greater than QBDSX's maximum drawdown of -18.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NCBGX and QBDSX.

Drawdown Indicators

	NCBGX	QBDSX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.27%	-18.38%	-22.89%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.81%	-3.09%	-2.72%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.76%	-3.76%	-8.00%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.39%	-7.40%	-12.99%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-22.98%	-18.38%	-4.60%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.58%	-8.75%	+8.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.89%	-6.86%	+0.97%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.33%	1.28%	+0.05%

Volatility

NCBGX vs. QBDSX - Volatility Comparison

New Covenant Balanced Growth Fund (NCBGX) has a higher volatility of 3.28% compared to Quantified Managed Income Fund (QBDSX) at 0.99%. This indicates that NCBGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QBDSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NCBGX	QBDSX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.28%	0.99%	+2.29%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.63%	2.47%	+4.16%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.24%	3.64%	+4.60%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.92%	4.31%	+6.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.27%	5.25%	+6.02%

NCBGX vs. QBDSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NCBGX has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than QBDSX's 1.31% expense ratio.

Dividends

NCBGX vs. QBDSX - Dividend Comparison

NCBGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.46%, more than QBDSX's 4.51% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NCBGX New Covenant Balanced Growth Fund	8.46%	9.02%	7.48%	2.28%	4.15%	3.90%	6.65%	5.58%	6.72%	1.53%	0.99%	12.13%
QBDSX Quantified Managed Income Fund	4.51%	4.47%	3.98%	4.51%	0.54%	0.71%	0.87%	2.26%	2.04%	2.51%	1.00%	3.89%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NCBGX and QBDSX in my portfolio?

NCBGX and QBDSX have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NCBGX or QBDSX?

NCBGX has higher volatility (3.28%) compared to QBDSX (0.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NCBGX dropped -41.27% vs QBDSX's -18.38%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NCBGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs -0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.