NCBDY vs. ESPO
NCBDY (BANDAI NAMCO Holdings Inc) is a stock, while ESPO (VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF) is Gaming fund tracking the MVIS Global Video Gaming and eSports Index. Over the past 5 years, NCBDY returned 1.62%/yr vs 7.12%/yr for ESPO. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
NCBDY vs. ESPO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NCBDY achieves a -6.43% return, which is significantly higher than ESPO's -10.86% return.
NCBDY
- 1D
- -0.55%
- 1M
- 8.36%
- 6M
- -8.10%
- YTD
- -6.43%
- 1Y
- -19.59%
- 3Y*
- 4.27%
- 5Y*
- 1.62%
- 10Y*
- —
ESPO
- 1D
- -0.52%
- 1M
- 4.99%
- 6M
- -11.34%
- YTD
- -10.86%
- 1Y
- -10.52%
- 3Y*
- 18.94%
- 5Y*
- 7.12%
- 10Y*
- —
NCBDY vs. ESPO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NCBDY BANDAI NAMCO Holdings Inc | -6.43% | 13.64% | 18.69% | -2.98% | -20.67% | -11.41% | 46.37% | 30.43% |
ESPO VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF | -10.86% | 25.79% | 47.61% | 33.64% | -34.71% | -2.13% | 83.93% | 18.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between NCBDY and ESPO is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2019 | 0.29 |
Over the past year, NCBDY and ESPO have become more correlated (0.52) than their long-term average of 0.29, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NCBDY vs. ESPO — Risk / Return Rank
NCBDY
ESPO
NCBDY vs. ESPO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BANDAI NAMCO Holdings Inc (NCBDY) and VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF (ESPO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NCBDY | ESPO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 0.91 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.52 | -0.38 | -0.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.77 | -0.64 | -0.13 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NCBDY vs. ESPO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NCBDY drawdown since its inception was -43.00%, smaller than the maximum ESPO drawdown of -50.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NCBDY and ESPO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NCBDY | ESPO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.00% | -50.99% | +7.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -41.96% | -29.43% | -12.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -41.96% | -29.43% | -12.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.96% | -48.33% | +6.37% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -35.25% | -23.56% | -11.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.62% | -15.16% | -5.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 28.47% | 17.38% | +11.09% |
Volatility
NCBDY vs. ESPO - Volatility Comparison
BANDAI NAMCO Holdings Inc (NCBDY) has a higher volatility of 6.53% compared to VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF (ESPO) at 4.86%. This indicates that NCBDY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ESPO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NCBDY | ESPO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.53% | 4.86% | +1.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.84% | 15.20% | +6.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.58% | 18.86% | +12.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.54% | 25.09% | +7.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.03% | 25.65% | +23.38% |
Dividends
NCBDY vs. ESPO - Dividend Comparison
NCBDY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ESPO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.40%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESPO VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF | 1.40% | 1.24% | 0.44% | 0.96% | 0.91% | 3.36% | 0.12% | 0.22% | 0.04% |
NCBDY BANDAI NAMCO Holdings Inc | 0.00% | 1.55% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NCBDY and ESPO have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NCBDY has higher volatility (6.53%) compared to ESPO (4.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NCBDY dropped -43.00% vs ESPO's -50.99%.
ESPO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.59 vs -0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NCBDY and ESPO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer