NCBDY vs. TM
NCBDY (BANDAI NAMCO Holdings Inc) and TM (Toyota Motor Corporation) are both stocks. Both are in the Consumer Cyclical sector — NCBDY in Leisure, TM in Auto Manufacturers. Over the past 5 years, NCBDY returned -1.28%/yr vs 1.94%/yr for TM. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
NCBDY vs. TM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NCBDY achieves a -13.20% return, which is significantly higher than TM's -17.24% return.
NCBDY
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- -0.60%
- YTD
- -13.20%
- 6M
- -17.31%
- 1Y
- -27.39%
- 3Y*
- -2.22%
- 5Y*
- -1.28%
- 10Y*
- —
TM
- 1D
- -1.30%
- 1M
- -9.17%
- YTD
- -17.24%
- 6M
- -9.87%
- 1Y
- -2.50%
- 3Y*
- 8.60%
- 5Y*
- 1.94%
- 10Y*
- 8.16%
NCBDY vs. TM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NCBDY BANDAI NAMCO Holdings Inc | -13.20% | 13.64% | 18.69% | -2.98% | -20.67% | -11.41% | 46.37% | 30.43% |
TM Toyota Motor Corporation | -17.24% | 13.82% | 8.88% | 38.23% | -24.43% | 23.21% | 13.62% | 16.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between NCBDY and TM is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2019 | 0.21 |
The correlation between NCBDY and TM shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (all time) to 0.36 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
NCBDY:
$14.83B
TM:
$230.90B
NCBDY:
$110.19
TM:
$2.98K
NCBDY:
0.10
TM:
0.06
NCBDY:
0.01
TM:
0.00
NCBDY:
0.01
TM:
0.00
NCBDY:
0.02
TM:
0.01
NCBDY:
$1.37T
TM:
$51.16T
NCBDY:
$538.45B
TM:
$8.54T
NCBDY:
$247.82B
TM:
$7.11T
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NCBDY vs. TM — Risk / Return Rank
NCBDY
TM
NCBDY vs. TM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BANDAI NAMCO Holdings Inc (NCBDY) and Toyota Motor Corporation (TM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NCBDY | TM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.77 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 1.01 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.67 | -0.09 | -0.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.05 | -0.23 | -0.82 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NCBDY | TM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.86 | -0.09 | -0.77 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.04 | 0.07 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.35 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.12 | 0.31 | -0.19 |
Drawdowns
NCBDY vs. TM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NCBDY drawdown since its inception was -43.00%, smaller than the maximum TM drawdown of -60.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NCBDY and TM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NCBDY | TM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.00% | -60.15% | +17.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -40.76% | -28.65% | -12.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -40.76% | -34.92% | -5.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.76% | -36.80% | -3.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.80% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -39.93% | -28.65% | -11.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.39% | -20.99% | +0.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 26.08% | 10.78% | +15.30% |
Volatility
NCBDY vs. TM - Volatility Comparison
BANDAI NAMCO Holdings Inc (NCBDY) has a higher volatility of 11.85% compared to Toyota Motor Corporation (TM) at 7.47%. This indicates that NCBDY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NCBDY | TM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.85% | 7.47% | +4.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.66% | 20.34% | +1.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.11% | 29.14% | +2.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.50% | 26.89% | +5.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.28% | 23.62% | +25.66% |
Dividends
NCBDY vs. TM - Dividend Comparison
NCBDY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.62%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NCBDY BANDAI NAMCO Holdings Inc | 0.00% | 1.55% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TM Toyota Motor Corporation | 1.62% | 2.95% | 2.81% | 2.45% | 2.90% | 2.45% | 2.74% | 1.30% | 3.40% | 2.96% | 3.23% | 5.59% |
Financials
NCBDY vs. TM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between BANDAI NAMCO Holdings Inc and Toyota Motor Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
NCBDY vs. TM - Profitability Comparison
NCBDY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BANDAI NAMCO Holdings Inc reported a gross profit of 136.86B and revenue of 352.36B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 38.8%.
TM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Toyota Motor Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.94T and revenue of 12.83T. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 15.1%.
NCBDY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BANDAI NAMCO Holdings Inc reported an operating income of 32.71B and revenue of 352.36B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.3%.
TM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Toyota Motor Corporation reported an operating income of 579.96B and revenue of 12.83T, resulting in an operating margin of 4.5%.
NCBDY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BANDAI NAMCO Holdings Inc reported a net income of 26.08B and revenue of 352.36B, resulting in a net margin of 7.4%.
TM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Toyota Motor Corporation reported a net income of 832.22B and revenue of 12.83T, resulting in a net margin of 6.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
NCBDY and TM have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NCBDY has higher volatility (11.85%) compared to TM (7.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NCBDY dropped -43.00% vs TM's -60.15%.
TM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.09 vs -0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NCBDY and TM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer