NBSSX vs. GLIFX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

NBSSX (Neuberger Berman Focus Fund) and GLIFX (Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Institutional Shares) are both Global Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, NBSSX returned 11.30%/yr vs 10.23%/yr for GLIFX. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NBSSX charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for GLIFX.

Performance

NBSSX vs. GLIFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neuberger Berman Focus Fund (NBSSX) and Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Institutional Shares (GLIFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with NBSSX having a 7.57% return and GLIFX slightly lower at 7.33%. Over the past 10 years, NBSSX has outperformed GLIFX with an annualized return of 11.30%, while GLIFX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.23% annualized return.

NBSSX

• 1D: 0.64%
• 1M: 7.25%
• YTD: 7.57%
• 6M: 9.08%
• 1Y: 22.87%
• 3Y*: 20.24%
• 5Y*: 8.00%
• 10Y*: 11.30%

GLIFX

• 1D: -0.51%
• 1M: -1.97%
• YTD: 7.33%
• 6M: 7.56%
• 1Y: 15.45%
• 3Y*: 13.91%
• 5Y*: 11.29%
• 10Y*: 10.23%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NBSSX vs. GLIFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
NBSSX Neuberger Berman Focus Fund	7.57%	21.36%	21.64%	23.73%	-31.74%	19.85%	24.45%	28.50%	-9.02%	19.39%
GLIFX Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Institutional Shares	7.33%	23.85%	6.71%	10.89%	-1.33%	19.91%	-4.51%	22.27%	-3.82%	20.77%

Correlation

The correlation between NBSSX and GLIFX is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.24
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.29
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.43
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.49
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2010	0.58

Over the past year, the correlation between NBSSX and GLIFX has dropped to 0.24 - well below their long-term average of 0.58, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

NBSSX vs. GLIFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NBSSX

NBSSX Risk / Return Rank: 33
NBSSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
NBSSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
NBSSX Omega Ratio Rank: 36
NBSSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
NBSSX Martin Ratio Rank: 32

GLIFX

GLIFX Risk / Return Rank: 24
GLIFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
GLIFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
GLIFX Omega Ratio Rank: 27
GLIFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
GLIFX Martin Ratio Rank: 23

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NBSSX vs. GLIFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman Focus Fund (NBSSX) and Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Institutional Shares (GLIFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NBSSX	GLIFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.73	1.46	+0.27
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.45	1.98	+0.47
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.27	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.88	1.74	+0.14
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.40	5.88	+1.52
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NBSSX vs. GLIFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NBSSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is comparable to the GLIFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NBSSX and GLIFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NBSSX	GLIFX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.73	1.46	+0.27
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.43	1.03	-0.61
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.59	0.77	-0.18
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.39	0.84	-0.45

Drawdowns

NBSSX vs. GLIFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NBSSX drawdown since its inception was -61.56%, which is greater than GLIFX's maximum drawdown of -29.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBSSX and GLIFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	NBSSX	GLIFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-61.56%	-29.65%	-31.91%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.61%	-9.00%	-3.61%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.39%	-10.02%	-10.37%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-40.77%	-17.15%	-23.62%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-40.77%	-29.65%	-11.12%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-5.79%	+5.79%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.03%	-3.36%	-9.67%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.18%	2.66%	+0.52%

Volatility

NBSSX vs. GLIFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Neuberger Berman Focus Fund (NBSSX) is 4.15%, while Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Institutional Shares (GLIFX) has a volatility of 4.53%. This indicates that NBSSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLIFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NBSSX	GLIFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.15%	4.53%	-0.38%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.65%	9.30%	+1.35%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.66%	10.72%	+2.94%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.88%	10.99%	+7.89%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.19%	13.33%	+5.86%

NBSSX vs. GLIFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NBSSX has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is lower than GLIFX's 0.97% expense ratio.

Dividends

NBSSX vs. GLIFX - Dividend Comparison

NBSSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.10%, more than GLIFX's 6.29% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GLIFX Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Institutional Shares	6.29%	6.22%	4.26%	2.95%	14.81%	6.21%	2.59%	4.44%	14.29%	6.94%	1.91%	11.33%
NBSSX Neuberger Berman Focus Fund	9.10%	9.78%	0.19%	0.59%	0.05%	19.35%	5.37%	12.78%	9.08%	8.32%	9.59%	5.18%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NBSSX and GLIFX in my portfolio?

NBSSX and GLIFX have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NBSSX or GLIFX?

GLIFX has higher volatility (4.53%) compared to NBSSX (4.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NBSSX dropped -61.56% vs GLIFX's -29.65%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NBSSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.