NBSSX vs. GCCHX

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Neuberger Berman Focus Fund (NBSSX) and GMO Climate Change Fund (GCCHX).

NBSSX is managed by Neuberger Berman. It was launched on Oct 18, 1955. GCCHX is managed by GMO. It was launched on Apr 4, 2017.

Performance

NBSSX vs. GCCHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neuberger Berman Focus Fund (NBSSX) and GMO Climate Change Fund (GCCHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

NBSSX vs. GCCHX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
NBSSX Neuberger Berman Focus Fund	-8.40%	21.36%	21.64%	23.73%	-31.74%	19.85%	24.45%	28.50%	-9.02%	11.69%
GCCHX GMO Climate Change Fund	10.71%	39.25%	-25.63%	-6.85%	-10.39%	21.84%	42.82%	27.36%	-16.35%	26.15%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NBSSX achieves a -8.40% return, which is significantly lower than GCCHX's 10.71% return.

NBSSX

• 1D: 2.95%
• 1M: -6.79%
• YTD: -8.40%
• 6M: -6.52%
• 1Y: 13.79%
• 3Y*: 14.76%
• 5Y*: 5.52%
• 10Y*: 9.93%

GCCHX

• 1D: 3.85%
• 1M: -2.15%
• YTD: 10.71%
• 6M: 17.26%
• 1Y: 69.04%
• 3Y*: 0.26%
• 5Y*: 1.25%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NBSSX vs. GCCHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NBSSX has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than GCCHX's 0.77% expense ratio.

NBSSX

Neuberger Berman Focus Fund

GCCHX

GMO Climate Change Fund

Return for Risk

NBSSX vs. GCCHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NBSSX

NBSSX Risk / Return Rank: 31
NBSSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
NBSSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
NBSSX Omega Ratio Rank: 35
NBSSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
NBSSX Martin Ratio Rank: 28

GCCHX

GCCHX Risk / Return Rank: 95
GCCHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
GCCHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
GCCHX Omega Ratio Rank: 90
GCCHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
GCCHX Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NBSSX vs. GCCHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman Focus Fund (NBSSX) and GMO Climate Change Fund (GCCHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NBSSX	GCCHX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.79	2.55	-1.76
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.23	3.20	-1.97
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.42	-0.24
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.92	4.57	-3.65
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.45	16.21	-12.76
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NBSSX vs. GCCHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NBSSX Sharpe Ratio is 0.79, which is lower than the GCCHX Sharpe Ratio of 2.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NBSSX and GCCHX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NBSSX	GCCHX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.79	2.55	-1.76
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.29	0.05	+0.25
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.52	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.37	0.37	0.00

Correlation

The correlation between NBSSX and GCCHX is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

NBSSX vs. GCCHX - Dividend Comparison

NBSSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.68%, more than GCCHX's 1.36% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NBSSX Neuberger Berman Focus Fund	10.68%	9.78%	0.19%	0.59%	0.05%	19.35%	5.37%	12.78%	9.08%	8.32%	9.59%	5.18%
GCCHX GMO Climate Change Fund	1.36%	1.51%	0.66%	0.96%	2.24%	25.43%	5.42%	4.03%	2.62%	3.43%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

NBSSX vs. GCCHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NBSSX drawdown since its inception was -61.56%, which is greater than GCCHX's maximum drawdown of -54.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBSSX and GCCHX.

Drawdown Indicators

	NBSSX	GCCHX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-61.56%	-54.32%	-7.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.61%	-14.89%	+2.28%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-40.77%	-54.32%	+13.55%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-40.77%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.03%	-9.81%	-0.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.07%	-14.11%	+1.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.36%	4.20%	-0.84%

Volatility

NBSSX vs. GCCHX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Neuberger Berman Focus Fund (NBSSX) is 6.53%, while GMO Climate Change Fund (GCCHX) has a volatility of 9.28%. This indicates that NBSSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GCCHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NBSSX	GCCHX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.53%	9.28%	-2.75%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.21%	17.44%	-7.23%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.50%	27.93%	-9.43%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.87%	26.92%	-8.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.14%	25.23%	-6.09%