PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NBSRX vs. NHINX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NBSRX vs. NHINX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neuberger Berman Sustainable Equity Fund (NBSRX) and Neuberger Berman High Income Bond Fund (NHINX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NBSRX achieves a 10.59% return, which is significantly higher than NHINX's 1.17% return. Over the past 10 years, NBSRX has outperformed NHINX with an annualized return of 14.30%, while NHINX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.59% annualized return.


NBSRX

1D
-0.53%
1M
1.89%
YTD
10.59%
6M
16.27%
1Y
27.04%
3Y*
23.84%
5Y*
13.33%
10Y*
14.30%

NHINX

1D
-0.13%
1M
0.24%
YTD
1.17%
6M
1.70%
1Y
6.43%
3Y*
8.18%
5Y*
2.86%
10Y*
4.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NBSRX vs. NHINX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NBSRX
Neuberger Berman Sustainable Equity Fund
10.59%17.37%28.23%26.76%-18.81%23.30%19.35%25.95%-6.00%18.84%
NHINX
Neuberger Berman High Income Bond Fund
1.17%8.39%7.94%9.92%-13.02%4.42%6.27%13.90%-2.63%5.09%

Correlation

The correlation between NBSRX and NHINX is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 1994

0.29

Over the past year, NBSRX and NHINX have become more correlated (0.51) than their long-term average of 0.29, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NBSRX vs. NHINX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NBSRX
NBSRX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
NBSRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NBSRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
NBSRX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
NBSRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
NBSRX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

NHINX
NHINX Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
NHINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NHINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
NHINX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
NHINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
NHINX Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NBSRX vs. NHINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman Sustainable Equity Fund (NBSRX) and Neuberger Berman High Income Bond Fund (NHINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NBSRXNHINXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.45

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.71

2.49

+0.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.66

12.15

-0.49

NBSRX vs. NHINX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NBSRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is comparable to the NHINX Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NBSRX and NHINX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NBSRXNHINXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.06

1.98

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

0.55

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

0.78

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

1.11

-0.52

Drawdowns

NBSRX vs. NHINX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NBSRX drawdown since its inception was -53.74%, which is greater than NHINX's maximum drawdown of -29.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBSRX and NHINX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NBSRXNHINXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.74%

-29.47%

-24.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.03%

-2.72%

-7.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.28%

-3.89%

-12.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.39%

-16.38%

-9.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.07%

-22.85%

-11.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.94%

-0.13%

-0.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.06%

-3.75%

-3.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.32%

0.55%

+1.77%

Volatility

NBSRX vs. NHINX - Volatility Comparison

Neuberger Berman Sustainable Equity Fund (NBSRX) has a higher volatility of 2.94% compared to Neuberger Berman High Income Bond Fund (NHINX) at 1.14%. This indicates that NBSRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NHINX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NBSRXNHINXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.94%

1.14%

+1.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.48%

2.67%

+7.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.19%

3.42%

+9.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.14%

5.23%

+10.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.49%

5.90%

+11.59%

NBSRX vs. NHINX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both NBSRX and NHINX have an expense ratio of 0.85%.


Dividends

NBSRX vs. NHINX - Dividend Comparison

NBSRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.13%, less than NHINX's 6.40% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NBSRX
Neuberger Berman Sustainable Equity Fund
2.13%2.35%5.88%9.72%10.06%10.35%6.16%9.08%10.03%6.14%4.53%6.40%
NHINX
Neuberger Berman High Income Bond Fund
6.40%6.43%6.80%5.38%4.37%4.67%4.73%5.22%5.63%5.00%5.33%6.38%

Frequently Asked Questions


NBSRX and NHINX have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NBSRX has higher volatility (2.94%) compared to NHINX (1.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NBSRX dropped -53.74% vs NHINX's -29.47%.

NBSRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NBSRX and NHINX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer