PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NBSRX vs. NHINX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NBSRX vs. NHINX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neuberger Berman Sustainable Equity Fund (NBSRX) and Neuberger Berman High Income Bond Fund (NHINX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NBSRX achieves a 15.68% return, which is significantly higher than NHINX's 0.90% return. Over the past 10 years, NBSRX has outperformed NHINX with an annualized return of 14.35%, while NHINX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.18% annualized return.


NBSRX

1D
1.82%
1M
-0.43%
6M
11.38%
YTD
15.68%
1Y
29.24%
3Y*
24.18%
5Y*
13.68%
10Y*
14.35%
ALL TIME*
10.68%

NHINX

1D
0.26%
1M
-0.66%
6M
0.38%
YTD
0.90%
1Y
4.17%
3Y*
7.49%
5Y*
2.72%
10Y*
4.18%
ALL TIME*
5.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

NBSRX vs. NHINX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NBSRX
Neuberger Berman Sustainable Equity Fund
15.68%17.37%28.23%26.76%-18.81%23.30%19.35%25.95%-6.00%18.84%
NHINX
Neuberger Berman High Income Bond Fund
0.90%8.39%7.94%9.92%-13.02%4.42%6.27%13.90%-2.63%5.09%

Correlation

The correlation between NBSRX and NHINX is 0.59, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.50

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 16, 1994

0.29

Over the past year, NBSRX and NHINX have become more correlated (0.59) than their long-term average of 0.29, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NBSRX vs. NHINX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NBSRX
NBSRX Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
NBSRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NBSRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
NBSRX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
NBSRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
NBSRX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

NHINX
NHINX Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
NHINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NHINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
NHINX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
NHINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
NHINX Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NBSRX vs. NHINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman Sustainable Equity Fund (NBSRX) and Neuberger Berman High Income Bond Fund (NHINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NBSRXNHINXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.28

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.06

1.65

+1.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.58

7.61

+3.97

NBSRX vs. NHINX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NBSRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is higher than the NHINX Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NBSRX and NHINX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NBSRX vs. NHINX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NBSRX drawdown since its inception was -53.74%, which is greater than NHINX's maximum drawdown of -29.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBSRX and NHINX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NBSRXNHINXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.74%

-29.47%

-24.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.03%

-2.72%

-7.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.28%

-3.89%

-12.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.39%

-16.38%

-9.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.07%

-22.85%

-11.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.00%

-0.79%

-1.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.04%

-3.74%

-3.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.65%

0.59%

+2.06%

Volatility

NBSRX vs. NHINX - Volatility Comparison

Neuberger Berman Sustainable Equity Fund (NBSRX) has a higher volatility of 5.02% compared to Neuberger Berman High Income Bond Fund (NHINX) at 0.66%. This indicates that NBSRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NHINX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NBSRXNHINXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.02%

0.66%

+4.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.94%

2.69%

+9.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.16%

3.38%

+11.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.48%

5.23%

+11.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.55%

5.85%

+11.70%

NBSRX vs. NHINX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both NBSRX and NHINX have an expense ratio of 0.85%.


Dividends

NBSRX vs. NHINX - Dividend Comparison

NBSRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.03%, less than NHINX's 5.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NBSRX
Neuberger Berman Sustainable Equity Fund
2.03%2.35%5.88%9.72%10.06%10.35%6.16%9.08%10.03%6.14%4.53%6.40%
NHINX
Neuberger Berman High Income Bond Fund
5.87%6.43%6.80%5.38%4.37%4.67%4.73%5.22%5.63%5.00%5.33%6.38%

Frequently Asked Questions


NBSRX and NHINX have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NBSRX has higher volatility (5.02%) compared to NHINX (0.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NBSRX dropped -53.74% vs NHINX's -29.47%.

NBSRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NBSRX and NHINX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer