PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NBRFX vs. GURIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NBRFX vs. GURIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neuberger Berman Real Estate Fund (NBRFX) and Guggenheim Risk Managed Real Estate Fund (GURIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with NBRFX having a 14.74% return and GURIX slightly higher at 15.30%. Over the past 10 years, NBRFX has underperformed GURIX with an annualized return of 6.67%, while GURIX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.73% annualized return.


NBRFX

1D
-0.26%
1M
0.01%
YTD
14.74%
6M
14.57%
1Y
12.77%
3Y*
10.35%
5Y*
2.86%
10Y*
6.67%

GURIX

1D
0.08%
1M
1.01%
YTD
15.30%
6M
14.80%
1Y
17.11%
3Y*
11.74%
5Y*
4.09%
10Y*
7.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NBRFX vs. GURIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NBRFX
Neuberger Berman Real Estate Fund
14.74%-2.14%5.02%11.70%-27.35%47.87%-1.34%31.06%-5.31%11.59%
GURIX
Guggenheim Risk Managed Real Estate Fund
15.30%2.04%4.96%13.01%-23.81%42.07%1.76%25.54%-3.97%10.22%

Correlation

The correlation between NBRFX and GURIX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2015

0.96

The correlation between NBRFX and GURIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NBRFX vs. GURIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NBRFX
NBRFX Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
NBRFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NBRFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
NBRFX Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
NBRFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
NBRFX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

GURIX
GURIX Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
GURIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GURIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
GURIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
GURIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
GURIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NBRFX vs. GURIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman Real Estate Fund (NBRFX) and Guggenheim Risk Managed Real Estate Fund (GURIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NBRFXGURIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.19

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.30

1.78

-0.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.62

5.94

-2.32

NBRFX vs. GURIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NBRFX Sharpe Ratio is 0.75, which is lower than the GURIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NBRFX and GURIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NBRFX vs. GURIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NBRFX drawdown since its inception was -70.52%, which is greater than GURIX's maximum drawdown of -33.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBRFX and GURIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NBRFXGURIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.52%

-33.32%

-37.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.84%

-8.07%

+0.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.06%

-16.62%

-1.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.60%

-30.30%

-5.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.56%

-33.32%

-4.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.32%

-0.46%

-3.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.80%

-7.87%

-3.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.86%

2.45%

+0.41%

Volatility

NBRFX vs. GURIX - Volatility Comparison

Neuberger Berman Real Estate Fund (NBRFX) and Guggenheim Risk Managed Real Estate Fund (GURIX) have volatilities of 5.27% and 5.16%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NBRFXGURIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.27%

5.16%

+0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.36%

9.76%

+0.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.70%

13.17%

+0.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.85%

17.27%

+2.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.39%

18.04%

+2.35%

NBRFX vs. GURIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NBRFX has a 1.39% expense ratio, which is higher than GURIX's 1.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

NBRFX vs. GURIX - Dividend Comparison

NBRFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, which matches GURIX's 1.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GURIX
Guggenheim Risk Managed Real Estate Fund
1.62%2.40%5.18%3.07%6.79%5.60%7.81%6.25%3.05%5.37%4.52%16.81%
NBRFX
Neuberger Berman Real Estate Fund
1.63%2.07%1.94%2.11%12.58%7.76%2.03%4.73%6.98%6.43%14.86%9.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, NBRFX and GURIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

NBRFX has higher volatility (5.27%) compared to GURIX (5.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NBRFX dropped -70.52% vs GURIX's -33.32%.

GURIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.09 vs 0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NBRFX and GURIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer