PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NBOS vs. INOV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NBOS vs. INOV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neuberger Berman Option Strategy ETF (NBOS) and Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - November (INOV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NBOS achieves a 6.51% return, which is significantly higher than INOV's 5.40% return.


NBOS

1D
-0.16%
1M
2.06%
YTD
6.51%
6M
7.94%
1Y
19.19%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

INOV

1D
-0.34%
1M
2.31%
YTD
5.40%
6M
7.23%
1Y
14.54%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NBOS vs. INOV - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between NBOS and INOV is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2024

0.62

The correlation between NBOS and INOV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NBOS vs. INOV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NBOS
NBOS Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
NBOS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NBOS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
NBOS Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
NBOS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
NBOS Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

INOV
INOV Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
INOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
INOV Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
INOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
INOV Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NBOS vs. INOV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman Option Strategy ETF (NBOS) and Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - November (INOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NBOSINOVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

1.34

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.09

2.02

+2.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

23.25

8.08

+15.17

NBOS vs. INOV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NBOS Sharpe Ratio is 2.58, which is higher than the INOV Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NBOS and INOV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NBOSINOVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.58

1.68

+0.90

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.29

1.82

-0.53

Drawdowns

NBOS vs. INOV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NBOS drawdown since its inception was -12.66%, which is greater than INOV's maximum drawdown of -8.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBOS and INOV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NBOSINOVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.66%

-8.01%

-4.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.71%

-7.24%

+2.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.17%

-0.47%

+0.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.10%

-0.89%

-0.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.83%

1.80%

-0.97%

Volatility

NBOS vs. INOV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Neuberger Berman Option Strategy ETF (NBOS) is 0.84%, while Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - November (INOV) has a volatility of 2.96%. This indicates that NBOS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than INOV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NBOSINOVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.84%

2.96%

-2.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.90%

7.71%

-1.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.47%

8.69%

-1.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.96%

8.56%

+1.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.96%

8.56%

+1.40%

NBOS vs. INOV - Expense Ratio Comparison

NBOS has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is lower than INOV's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

NBOS vs. INOV - Dividend Comparison

NBOS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.93%, while INOV has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


NBOS and INOV have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

INOV has higher volatility (2.96%) compared to NBOS (0.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NBOS dropped -12.66% vs INOV's -8.01%.

On 1-year performance, NBOS leads with 19.19% vs 14.54% for INOV. On fees, NBOS is cheaper at 0.56% per year. On volatility, NBOS has been the lower-risk option at 0.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, NBOS has performed better with a 19.19% return vs 14.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NBOS is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for INOV.

NBOS has the higher dividend yield at 7.93%, compared with 0.00% for INOV.

They also come from different issuers: Neuberger Berman and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for NBOS and 0.85% for INOV.

NBOS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NBOS and INOV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer