PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NBOS vs. PUTW
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

NBOS vs. PUTW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neuberger Berman Option Strategy ETF (NBOS) and WisdomTree Equity Premium Income Fund (PUTW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

NBOS vs. PUTW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
NBOS
Neuberger Berman Option Strategy ETF
0.16%12.22%10.99%
PUTW
WisdomTree Equity Premium Income Fund
-1.66%14.45%13.76%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NBOS achieves a 0.16% return, which is significantly higher than PUTW's -1.66% return.


NBOS

1D
2.22%
1M
-2.26%
YTD
0.16%
6M
3.96%
1Y
13.49%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PUTW

1D
2.60%
1M
-3.50%
YTD
-1.66%
6M
1.99%
1Y
15.64%
3Y*
13.04%
5Y*
9.37%
10Y*
7.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


NBOS vs. PUTW - Expense Ratio Comparison

NBOS has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is higher than PUTW's 0.44% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

NBOS vs. PUTW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NBOS
NBOS Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
NBOS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NBOS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
NBOS Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
NBOS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
NBOS Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

PUTW
PUTW Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
PUTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PUTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
PUTW Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
PUTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
PUTW Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NBOS vs. PUTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman Option Strategy ETF (NBOS) and WisdomTree Equity Premium Income Fund (PUTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NBOSPUTWDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.15

1.10

+0.05

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.60

1.65

-0.04

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.27

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.47

1.62

-0.15

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.32

8.70

-0.38

NBOS vs. PUTW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NBOS Sharpe Ratio is 1.15, which is comparable to the PUTW Sharpe Ratio of 1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NBOS and PUTW, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NBOSPUTWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.15

1.10

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.05

0.61

+0.45

Correlation

The correlation between NBOS and PUTW is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

NBOS vs. PUTW - Dividend Comparison

NBOS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.14%, less than PUTW's 12.37% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
NBOS
Neuberger Berman Option Strategy ETF
8.14%7.81%7.32%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PUTW
WisdomTree Equity Premium Income Fund
12.37%13.18%11.99%8.94%3.27%0.00%1.43%1.47%6.46%3.52%2.27%

Drawdowns

NBOS vs. PUTW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NBOS drawdown since its inception was -12.66%, smaller than the maximum PUTW drawdown of -28.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBOS and PUTW.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


NBOSPUTWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.66%

-28.40%

+15.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.39%

-9.90%

+0.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.60%

-4.73%

+2.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.17%

-3.48%

+2.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.66%

1.85%

-0.19%

Volatility

NBOS vs. PUTW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Neuberger Berman Option Strategy ETF (NBOS) is 4.12%, while WisdomTree Equity Premium Income Fund (PUTW) has a volatility of 4.77%. This indicates that NBOS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PUTW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


NBOSPUTWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.12%

4.77%

-0.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.66%

7.82%

-1.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.77%

14.33%

-2.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.24%

12.21%

-1.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.24%

13.23%

-2.99%