NBOS vs. NEMD

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Neuberger Berman Option Strategy ETF (NBOS) and Neuberger Berman Emerging Markets Debt Hard Currency ETF (NEMD).

NBOS and NEMD are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. NBOS is an actively managed fund by Neuberger Berman. It was launched on Sep 16, 2016. NEMD is an actively managed fund by Neuberger Berman. It was launched on Sep 27, 2013.

Performance

NBOS vs. NEMD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neuberger Berman Option Strategy ETF (NBOS) and Neuberger Berman Emerging Markets Debt Hard Currency ETF (NEMD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

NBOS vs. NEMD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
NBOS Neuberger Berman Option Strategy ETF	0.16%	7.20%
NEMD Neuberger Berman Emerging Markets Debt Hard Currency ETF	-0.36%	7.07%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NBOS achieves a 0.16% return, which is significantly higher than NEMD's -0.36% return.

NBOS

• 1D: 2.22%
• 1M: -2.26%
• YTD: 0.16%
• 6M: 3.96%
• 1Y: 13.49%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NEMD

• 1D: 1.13%
• 1M: -3.18%
• YTD: -0.36%
• 6M: 3.76%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NBOS vs. NEMD - Expense Ratio Comparison

NBOS has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is lower than NEMD's 0.60% expense ratio.

NEMD

Neuberger Berman Emerging Markets Debt Hard Currency ETF

NBOS

Neuberger Berman Option Strategy ETF

Return for Risk

NBOS vs. NEMD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NBOS

NBOS Risk / Return Rank: 68
NBOS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
NBOS Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
NBOS Omega Ratio Rank: 75
NBOS Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
NBOS Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NBOS vs. NEMD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman Option Strategy ETF (NBOS) and Neuberger Berman Emerging Markets Debt Hard Currency ETF (NEMD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NBOS	NEMD	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.15	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.60	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.47	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.32	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NBOS	NEMD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.15	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.05	1.71	-0.65

Correlation

The correlation between NBOS and NEMD is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

NBOS vs. NEMD - Dividend Comparison

NBOS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.14%, more than NEMD's 3.88% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024
NBOS Neuberger Berman Option Strategy ETF	8.14%	7.81%	7.32%
NEMD Neuberger Berman Emerging Markets Debt Hard Currency ETF	3.88%	2.39%	0.00%

Drawdowns

NBOS vs. NEMD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NBOS drawdown since its inception was -12.66%, which is greater than NEMD's maximum drawdown of -4.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBOS and NEMD.

Drawdown Indicators

	NBOS	NEMD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.66%	-4.43%	-8.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.39%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.60%	-3.35%	+0.75%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.17%	-0.49%	-0.68%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.66%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	NBOS	NEMD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.12%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.66%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.77%	6.30%	+5.47%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.24%	6.30%	+3.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.24%	6.30%	+3.94%