NBOS vs. NEMD

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

NBOS (Neuberger Berman Option Strategy ETF) and NEMD (Neuberger Berman Emerging Markets Debt Hard Currency ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NBOS is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Neuberger Berman, while NEMD is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund actively managed by Neuberger Berman. Both are actively managed. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NBOS charges 0.56%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for NEMD.

Performance

NBOS vs. NEMD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neuberger Berman Option Strategy ETF (NBOS) and Neuberger Berman Emerging Markets Debt Hard Currency ETF (NEMD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NBOS achieves a 6.68% return, which is significantly higher than NEMD's 3.51% return.

NBOS

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: 0.90%
• YTD: 6.68%
• 6M: 6.78%
• 1Y: 18.53%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NEMD

• 1D: -1.20%
• 1M: 1.02%
• YTD: 3.51%
• 6M: 3.55%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NBOS vs. NEMD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
NBOS Neuberger Berman Option Strategy ETF	6.68%	6.99%
NEMD Neuberger Berman Emerging Markets Debt Hard Currency ETF	3.51%	7.10%

Correlation

The correlation between NBOS and NEMD is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 11, 2025	0.52

Return for Risk

NBOS vs. NEMD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NBOS

NBOS Risk / Return Rank: 82
NBOS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
NBOS Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
NBOS Omega Ratio Rank: 86
NBOS Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
NBOS Martin Ratio Rank: 92

NEMD

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NBOS vs. NEMD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman Option Strategy ETF (NBOS) and Neuberger Berman Emerging Markets Debt Hard Currency ETF (NEMD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NBOS	NEMD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.37	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.31	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.50	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.95	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	21.58	—	—

Drawdowns

NBOS vs. NEMD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NBOS drawdown since its inception was -12.66%, which is greater than NEMD's maximum drawdown of -4.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBOS and NEMD.

Drawdown Indicators

	NBOS	NEMD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.66%	-4.43%	-8.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.71%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.28%	-1.31%	+1.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.10%	-0.56%	-0.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.86%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	NBOS	NEMD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.76%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.41%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.85%	6.65%	+1.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.00%	6.65%	+3.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.00%	6.65%	+3.35%

NBOS vs. NEMD - Expense Ratio Comparison

NBOS has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is lower than NEMD's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

NBOS vs. NEMD - Dividend Comparison

NBOS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.92%, more than NEMD's 4.74% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
NBOS Neuberger Berman Option Strategy ETF	7.92%	7.81%	7.32%
NEMD Neuberger Berman Emerging Markets Debt Hard Currency ETF	4.74%	2.39%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NBOS and NEMD in my portfolio?

NBOS and NEMD have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, NBOS or NEMD?

On fees, NBOS is cheaper at 0.56% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, NBOS or NEMD?

NBOS is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for NEMD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NBOS or NEMD?

NBOS has the higher dividend yield at 7.92%, compared with 4.74% for NEMD.

What is the main difference between NBOS and NEMD?

NBOS is categorized as Options Trading, while NEMD is Emerging Markets Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for NBOS and 0.60% for NEMD.