INOV vs. QBUL
INOV (Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - November) and QBUL (TrueShares Quarterly Bull Hedge ETF) are both Options Trading funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, INOV returned 14.54% vs 6.05% for QBUL. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. INOV charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for QBUL.
Performance
INOV vs. QBUL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, INOV achieves a 5.76% return, which is significantly higher than QBUL's 2.81% return.
INOV
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- 1.61%
- YTD
- 5.76%
- 6M
- 7.96%
- 1Y
- 14.54%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QBUL
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 1.73%
- YTD
- 2.81%
- 6M
- 2.73%
- 1Y
- 6.05%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
INOV vs. QBUL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
INOV Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - November | 5.76% | 20.64% | 0.68% |
QBUL TrueShares Quarterly Bull Hedge ETF | 2.81% | 4.87% | 0.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between INOV and QBUL is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2024 | 0.46 |
The correlation between INOV and QBUL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.46 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
INOV vs. QBUL — Risk / Return Rank
INOV
QBUL
INOV vs. QBUL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - November (INOV) and TrueShares Quarterly Bull Hedge ETF (QBUL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| INOV | QBUL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.68 | 1.72 | -0.04 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.43 | 2.53 | -0.10 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.32 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.09 | 2.53 | -0.44 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.41 | 5.02 | +3.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| INOV | QBUL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.68 | 1.72 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.84 | 1.15 | +0.69 |
Drawdowns
INOV vs. QBUL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INOV drawdown since its inception was -8.01%, which is greater than QBUL's maximum drawdown of -2.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INOV and QBUL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| INOV | QBUL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.01% | -2.45% | -5.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.24% | -2.45% | -4.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.13% | 0.00% | -0.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.89% | -0.98% | +0.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.80% | 1.24% | +0.56% |
Volatility
INOV vs. QBUL - Volatility Comparison
Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - November (INOV) has a higher volatility of 3.14% compared to TrueShares Quarterly Bull Hedge ETF (QBUL) at 1.26%. This indicates that INOV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QBUL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| INOV | QBUL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.14% | 1.26% | +1.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.70% | 2.23% | +5.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.69% | 3.53% | +5.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.57% | 3.78% | +4.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.57% | 3.78% | +4.79% |
INOV vs. QBUL - Expense Ratio Comparison
INOV has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than QBUL's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
INOV vs. QBUL - Dividend Comparison
INOV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QBUL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.70%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
INOV Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - November | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QBUL TrueShares Quarterly Bull Hedge ETF | 8.70% | 8.94% | 1.82% |
Frequently Asked Questions
INOV and QBUL have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
INOV has higher volatility (3.14%) compared to QBUL (1.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INOV dropped -8.01% vs QBUL's -2.45%.
On 1-year performance, INOV leads with 14.54% vs 6.05% for QBUL. On fees, QBUL is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, QBUL has been the lower-risk option at 1.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, INOV has performed better with a 14.54% return vs 6.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QBUL is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for INOV.
QBUL has the higher dividend yield at 8.70%, compared with 0.00% for INOV.
They also come from different issuers: Innovator and TrueShares. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for INOV and 0.79% for QBUL.
QBUL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for INOV and QBUL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer