PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
INOV vs. QBUL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

INOV vs. QBUL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - November (INOV) and TrueShares Quarterly Bull Hedge ETF (QBUL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INOV achieves a 5.76% return, which is significantly higher than QBUL's 2.81% return.


INOV

1D
0.20%
1M
1.61%
YTD
5.76%
6M
7.96%
1Y
14.54%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QBUL

1D
0.12%
1M
1.73%
YTD
2.81%
6M
2.73%
1Y
6.05%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INOV vs. QBUL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between INOV and QBUL is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2024

0.46

The correlation between INOV and QBUL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.46 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

INOV vs. QBUL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INOV
INOV Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
INOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
INOV Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
INOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
INOV Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

QBUL
QBUL Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
QBUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QBUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
QBUL Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
QBUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
QBUL Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INOV vs. QBUL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - November (INOV) and TrueShares Quarterly Bull Hedge ETF (QBUL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


INOVQBULDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.68

1.72

-0.04

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.43

2.53

-0.10

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.32

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.09

2.53

-0.44

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.41

5.02

+3.39

INOV vs. QBUL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INOV Sharpe Ratio is 1.68, which is comparable to the QBUL Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INOV and QBUL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


INOVQBULDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.68

1.72

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.84

1.15

+0.69

Drawdowns

INOV vs. QBUL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INOV drawdown since its inception was -8.01%, which is greater than QBUL's maximum drawdown of -2.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INOV and QBUL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


INOVQBULDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.01%

-2.45%

-5.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.24%

-2.45%

-4.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.13%

0.00%

-0.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.89%

-0.98%

+0.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.80%

1.24%

+0.56%

Volatility

INOV vs. QBUL - Volatility Comparison

Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - November (INOV) has a higher volatility of 3.14% compared to TrueShares Quarterly Bull Hedge ETF (QBUL) at 1.26%. This indicates that INOV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QBUL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


INOVQBULDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.14%

1.26%

+1.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.70%

2.23%

+5.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.69%

3.53%

+5.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.57%

3.78%

+4.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.57%

3.78%

+4.79%

INOV vs. QBUL - Expense Ratio Comparison

INOV has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than QBUL's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

INOV vs. QBUL - Dividend Comparison

INOV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QBUL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.70%.


Frequently Asked Questions


INOV and QBUL have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

INOV has higher volatility (3.14%) compared to QBUL (1.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INOV dropped -8.01% vs QBUL's -2.45%.

On 1-year performance, INOV leads with 14.54% vs 6.05% for QBUL. On fees, QBUL is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, QBUL has been the lower-risk option at 1.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, INOV has performed better with a 14.54% return vs 6.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QBUL is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for INOV.

QBUL has the higher dividend yield at 8.70%, compared with 0.00% for INOV.

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and TrueShares. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for INOV and 0.79% for QBUL.

QBUL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for INOV and QBUL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer