SQIFX vs. SSCDX
Compare and contrast key facts about Sit Quality Income Fund (SQIFX) and Sit Small Cap Dividend Growth Fund (SSCDX).
SQIFX is managed by Sit. It was launched on Dec 31, 2012. SSCDX is managed by Sit. It was launched on Mar 31, 2015.
Performance
SQIFX vs. SSCDX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SQIFX vs. SSCDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SQIFX Sit Quality Income Fund | 0.05% | 6.32% | 3.93% | 3.39% | -2.68% | 1.24% | 2.89% | 3.13% | 0.90% | 1.16% |
SSCDX Sit Small Cap Dividend Growth Fund | 3.52% | 12.90% | 15.50% | 15.50% | -17.15% | 23.46% | 16.21% | 27.12% | -17.10% | 13.69% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SQIFX achieves a 0.05% return, which is significantly lower than SSCDX's 3.52% return. Over the past 10 years, SQIFX has underperformed SSCDX with an annualized return of 2.07%, while SSCDX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.84% annualized return.
SQIFX
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- -1.13%
- YTD
- 0.05%
- 6M
- 1.21%
- 1Y
- 4.04%
- 3Y*
- 4.14%
- 5Y*
- 2.33%
- 10Y*
- 2.07%
SSCDX
- 1D
- -1.72%
- 1M
- -7.13%
- YTD
- 3.52%
- 6M
- 5.65%
- 1Y
- 24.10%
- 3Y*
- 14.77%
- 5Y*
- 7.39%
- 10Y*
- 9.84%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SQIFX vs. SSCDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SQIFX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is lower than SSCDX's 1.35% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SQIFX vs. SSCDX — Risk / Return Rank
SQIFX
SSCDX
SQIFX vs. SSCDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sit Quality Income Fund (SQIFX) and Sit Small Cap Dividend Growth Fund (SSCDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SQIFX | SSCDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.80 | 1.16 | +0.63 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.90 | 1.71 | +1.19 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.24 | +0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.07 | 1.69 | +1.38 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.11 | 7.32 | +3.79 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SQIFX | SSCDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.80 | 1.16 | +0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.02 | 0.37 | +0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.18 | 0.48 | +0.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.05 | 0.43 | +0.62 |
Correlation
The correlation between SQIFX and SSCDX is 0.03, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
SQIFX vs. SSCDX - Dividend Comparison
SQIFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.87%, more than SSCDX's 2.13% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SQIFX Sit Quality Income Fund | 3.87% | 4.21% | 3.96% | 2.78% | 3.42% | 1.23% | 1.13% | 1.95% | 1.82% | 1.16% | 0.89% | 0.95% |
SSCDX Sit Small Cap Dividend Growth Fund | 2.13% | 2.21% | 1.79% | 1.07% | 4.26% | 8.47% | 0.77% | 1.33% | 2.69% | 0.85% | 1.16% | 0.87% |
Drawdowns
SQIFX vs. SSCDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SQIFX drawdown since its inception was -4.22%, smaller than the maximum SSCDX drawdown of -38.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SQIFX and SSCDX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SQIFX | SSCDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.22% | -38.79% | +34.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.55% | -13.18% | +11.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -4.22% | -27.06% | +22.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -4.22% | -38.79% | +34.57% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.13% | -8.22% | +7.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.45% | -7.09% | +6.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.43% | 3.04% | -2.61% |
Volatility
SQIFX vs. SSCDX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Sit Quality Income Fund (SQIFX) is 0.81%, while Sit Small Cap Dividend Growth Fund (SSCDX) has a volatility of 5.97%. This indicates that SQIFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SSCDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SQIFX | SSCDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.81% | 5.97% | -5.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.53% | 12.14% | -10.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.47% | 20.88% | -18.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.29% | 20.03% | -17.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.77% | 20.62% | -18.85% |