SQIFX vs. CBUDX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

SQIFX (Sit Quality Income Fund) and CBUDX (CrossingBridge Ultra-Short Duration Fund) are both Ultrashort Bond funds. Over the past 3 years, SQIFX returned 4.28%/yr vs 5.35%/yr for CBUDX. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SQIFX charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for CBUDX.

Performance

SQIFX vs. CBUDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sit Quality Income Fund (SQIFX) and CrossingBridge Ultra-Short Duration Fund (CBUDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SQIFX achieves a 0.33% return, which is significantly lower than CBUDX's 1.74% return.

SQIFX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.43%
• YTD: 0.33%
• 6M: 0.70%
• 1Y: 3.72%
• 3Y*: 4.28%
• 5Y*: 2.28%
• 10Y*: 2.08%

CBUDX

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: 0.33%
• YTD: 1.74%
• 6M: 2.09%
• 1Y: 4.54%
• 3Y*: 5.35%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SQIFX vs. CBUDX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
SQIFX Sit Quality Income Fund	0.33%	6.32%	3.93%	3.39%	-2.68%	0.23%
CBUDX CrossingBridge Ultra-Short Duration Fund	1.74%	5.25%	5.83%	5.61%	2.25%	0.26%

Correlation

The correlation between SQIFX and CBUDX is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.10
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.06
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2021	0.06

Return for Risk

SQIFX vs. CBUDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SQIFX

SQIFX Risk / Return Rank: 47
SQIFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
SQIFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
SQIFX Omega Ratio Rank: 48
SQIFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
SQIFX Martin Ratio Rank: 44

CBUDX

CBUDX Risk / Return Rank: 99
CBUDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
CBUDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
CBUDX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
CBUDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
CBUDX Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SQIFX vs. CBUDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sit Quality Income Fund (SQIFX) and CrossingBridge Ultra-Short Duration Fund (CBUDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SQIFX	CBUDX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.70	5.48	-3.79
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.93	10.32	-7.39
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	4.30	-2.95
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.49	11.63	-9.15
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.96	78.59	-69.63

SQIFX vs. CBUDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SQIFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is lower than the CBUDX Sharpe Ratio of 5.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SQIFX and CBUDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SQIFX vs. CBUDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SQIFX drawdown since its inception was -4.22%, which is greater than CBUDX's maximum drawdown of -0.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SQIFX and CBUDX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SQIFX	CBUDX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.22%	-0.40%	-3.82%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.55%	-0.40%	-1.15%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-1.55%	-0.40%	-1.15%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-4.22%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-4.22%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.52%	0.00%	-0.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.45%	-0.03%	-0.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.43%	0.06%	+0.37%

Volatility

SQIFX vs. CBUDX - Volatility Comparison

Sit Quality Income Fund (SQIFX) has a higher volatility of 0.72% compared to CrossingBridge Ultra-Short Duration Fund (CBUDX) at 0.28%. This indicates that SQIFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CBUDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SQIFX	CBUDX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.72%	0.28%	+0.44%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.63%	0.68%	+0.95%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.26%	0.85%	+1.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.34%	0.91%	+1.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1.80%	0.91%	+0.89%

SQIFX vs. CBUDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SQIFX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than CBUDX's 0.89% expense ratio.

Dividends

SQIFX vs. CBUDX - Dividend Comparison

SQIFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.88%, less than CBUDX's 4.44% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CBUDX CrossingBridge Ultra-Short Duration Fund	4.44%	4.61%	5.68%	5.67%	2.94%	0.16%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SQIFX Sit Quality Income Fund	3.88%	4.21%	3.96%	2.78%	3.42%	1.23%	1.13%	1.95%	1.82%	1.16%	0.89%	0.95%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SQIFX and CBUDX in my portfolio?

SQIFX and CBUDX have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SQIFX or CBUDX?

SQIFX has higher volatility (0.72%) compared to CBUDX (0.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SQIFX dropped -4.22% vs CBUDX's -0.40%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CBUDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.48 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.