NBNGX vs. KMKNX
Compare and contrast key facts about SIT Mid Cap Growth Fund (NBNGX) and Kinetics Market Opportunities Fund No Load Class (KMKNX).
NBNGX is managed by Sit. It was launched on Sep 2, 1982. KMKNX is an actively managed fund by Kinetics. It was launched on Jan 31, 2006.
Performance
NBNGX vs. KMKNX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
NBNGX vs. KMKNX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NBNGX SIT Mid Cap Growth Fund | -3.41% | 8.72% | 74.13% | 21.98% | -24.10% | 15.78% | 33.16% | 30.27% | -7.42% | 19.01% |
KMKNX Kinetics Market Opportunities Fund No Load Class | 22.52% | -3.09% | 84.05% | -7.34% | 14.98% | 28.03% | 19.56% | 22.76% | -10.68% | 47.26% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NBNGX achieves a -3.41% return, which is significantly lower than KMKNX's 22.52% return. Over the past 10 years, NBNGX has underperformed KMKNX with an annualized return of 14.59%, while KMKNX has yielded a comparatively higher 21.10% annualized return.
NBNGX
- 1D
- 3.09%
- 1M
- -6.66%
- YTD
- -3.41%
- 6M
- -3.53%
- 1Y
- 17.39%
- 3Y*
- 27.75%
- 5Y*
- 13.51%
- 10Y*
- 14.59%
KMKNX
- 1D
- 1.41%
- 1M
- -7.64%
- YTD
- 22.52%
- 6M
- 11.44%
- 1Y
- 6.51%
- 3Y*
- 32.40%
- 5Y*
- 15.19%
- 10Y*
- 21.10%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NBNGX vs. KMKNX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NBNGX has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is lower than KMKNX's 1.40% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
NBNGX vs. KMKNX — Risk / Return Rank
NBNGX
KMKNX
NBNGX vs. KMKNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SIT Mid Cap Growth Fund (NBNGX) and Kinetics Market Opportunities Fund No Load Class (KMKNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NBNGX | KMKNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.83 | 0.32 | +0.50 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.30 | 0.62 | +0.68 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.08 | +0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.45 | 0.43 | +1.02 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.74 | 0.79 | +4.96 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NBNGX | KMKNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 | 0.32 | +0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 | 0.58 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | 0.90 | -0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 0.58 | -0.21 |
Correlation
The correlation between NBNGX and KMKNX is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
NBNGX vs. KMKNX - Dividend Comparison
NBNGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.51%, more than KMKNX's 0.54% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NBNGX SIT Mid Cap Growth Fund | 3.51% | 3.39% | 38.38% | 0.47% | 3.08% | 12.28% | 4.17% | 7.51% | 12.40% | 4.24% | 1.00% | 18.44% |
KMKNX Kinetics Market Opportunities Fund No Load Class | 0.54% | 0.66% | 0.81% | 0.87% | 1.36% | 1.56% | 0.26% | 0.33% | 9.13% | 0.64% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
NBNGX vs. KMKNX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NBNGX drawdown since its inception was -70.94%, which is greater than KMKNX's maximum drawdown of -65.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBNGX and KMKNX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| NBNGX | KMKNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.94% | -65.47% | -5.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.32% | -19.52% | +7.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.84% | -31.47% | -3.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.14% | -31.47% | -3.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.91% | -10.15% | +3.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.26% | -15.29% | -5.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.11% | 10.58% | -7.47% |
Volatility
NBNGX vs. KMKNX - Volatility Comparison
SIT Mid Cap Growth Fund (NBNGX) and Kinetics Market Opportunities Fund No Load Class (KMKNX) have volatilities of 6.83% and 7.07%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| NBNGX | KMKNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.83% | 7.07% | -0.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.20% | 17.87% | -4.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.95% | 24.61% | -2.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.96% | 26.44% | +3.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.79% | 23.39% | +2.40% |