NBIZ vs. QQQP

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

NBIZ (Tradr 2X Short NBIS Daily ETF) and QQQP (Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Quarterly ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NBIZ is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the Nebius Group N.V. (NBIS), while QQQP is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Tradr. NBIZ is passively managed, while QQQP is actively managed. Their -0.48 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. NBIZ charges 1.49%/yr vs 1.30%/yr for QQQP.

Performance

NBIZ vs. QQQP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Short NBIS Daily ETF (NBIZ) and Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Quarterly ETF (QQQP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

NBIZ

• 1D: -2.71%
• 1M: -37.07%
• 6M: -98.00%
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

QQQP

• 1D: 1.56%
• 1M: -7.63%
• 6M: 13.12%
• YTD: 15.23%
• 1Y: 37.33%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 31.06%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
NBIZ Tradr 2X Short NBIS Daily ETF	$76.41M	$57.60M	$42.81M
QQQP Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Quarterly ETF	$865.31K	$566.51K	$438.05K

NBIZ vs. QQQP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
NBIZ Tradr 2X Short NBIS Daily ETF	-97.27%
QQQP Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Quarterly ETF	14.98%

Correlation

The correlation between NBIZ and QQQP is -0.48, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2026	-0.48

Return for Risk

NBIZ vs. QQQP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NBIZ

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

QQQP

QQQP Risk / Return Rank: 36
QQQP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
QQQP Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
QQQP Omega Ratio Rank: 34
QQQP Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
QQQP Martin Ratio Rank: 38

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NBIZ vs. QQQP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Short NBIS Daily ETF (NBIZ) and Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Quarterly ETF (QQQP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NBIZ	QQQP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	0.86	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.35	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.16	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	1.27	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	4.02	—

Drawdowns

NBIZ vs. QQQP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NBIZ drawdown since its inception was -98.41%, which is greater than QQQP's maximum drawdown of -42.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBIZ and QQQP.

Drawdown Indicators

	NBIZ	QQQP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-98.41%	-42.50%	-55.91%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-25.35%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-98.41%	-15.47%	-82.94%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-77.23%	-7.46%	-69.77%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	8.01%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	NBIZ	QQQP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	14.67%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	30.88%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	237.50%	37.67%	+199.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	237.50%	44.67%	+192.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	237.50%	44.67%	+192.83%

NBIZ vs. QQQP - Expense Ratio Comparison

NBIZ has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQP's 1.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

NBIZ vs. QQQP - Dividend Comparison

Neither NBIZ nor QQQP has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NBIZ and QQQP in my portfolio?

NBIZ and QQQP have a correlation of -0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, NBIZ or QQQP?

On fees, QQQP is cheaper at 1.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, NBIZ or QQQP?

QQQP is cheaper with a 1.30% expense ratio, compared with 1.49% for NBIZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NBIZ or QQQP?

NBIZ and QQQP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between NBIZ and QQQP?

NBIZ is categorized as Inverse Equities, while QQQP is Leveraged Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.49% for NBIZ and 1.30% for QQQP.